From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
Cc: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: consistent rxhash
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:57:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271775421.7895.19.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCDB425.9050007@lastsummer.de>
Le mardi 20 avril 2010 à 16:03 +0200, Franco Fichtner a écrit :
>
> It is funny, but I fail to see the big picture of the
> firewall / conntrack application here. It looks like
> this is needed for local netperf tests to impress, but
> it's a quite special use case, isn't it?
I know many applications using TCP on loopback, they are real :)
What I find 'funny' are not the tbench results, but the fact that RFS
can give pretty good hints to process scheduler, something that might be
good to investigate by scheduler specialists.
In the meantime, if some admin finds that setting RFS on loopback can
boost by 10% its application, why not ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-20 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 5:47 [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 6:33 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 6:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 7:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 7:26 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 7:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 7:52 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: rps_sock_flow_table is mostly read Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 7:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 15:35 ` [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 18:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 18:35 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 18:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 20:42 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-16 21:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 21:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 16:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-17 17:38 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-18 0:06 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-18 11:06 ` Franco Fichtner
2010-04-19 20:09 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 20:23 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-19 21:19 ` David Miller
2010-04-26 8:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 21:59 ` David Miller
2010-04-27 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-27 22:10 ` David Miller
2010-04-19 23:38 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 7:56 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] rps: consistent rxhash Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 8:18 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 12:48 ` Franco Fichtner
2010-04-20 13:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 14:03 ` Franco Fichtner
2010-04-20 14:57 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-20 21:41 ` David Miller
2010-04-20 23:35 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-20 23:38 ` David Miller
2010-04-21 19:12 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-23 20:44 ` David Miller
2010-05-06 8:06 ` David Miller
2010-05-06 14:45 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-20 15:09 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-21 9:29 ` Franco Fichtner
2010-04-21 9:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-21 11:06 ` Franco Fichtner
2010-04-21 11:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-20 15:04 ` [PATCH v5] rfs: Receive Flow Steering Tom Herbert
2010-04-20 15:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 19:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-16 22:49 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 22:53 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 22:57 ` David Miller
2010-04-17 0:22 ` Tom Herbert
2010-04-17 0:58 ` David Miller
2010-04-16 11:57 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 13:32 ` jamal
2010-04-16 13:42 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-16 14:05 ` jamal
2010-04-16 15:28 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271775421.7895.19.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=franco@lastsummer.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox