public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@diku.dk>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>,
	hawk@comx.dk,
	Linux Kernel Network Hackers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 23:14:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271970893.7895.6507.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271970199.7895.6482.camel@edumazet-laptop>

Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 23:03 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 22:38 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer a écrit :
> > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> > > Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 08:51 -0700, Paul E. McKenney a écrit :
> > >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:53:49PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >>> Le jeudi 22 avril 2010 à 16:36 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>> If we can do the 'retry' a 10 times, it means the attacker was really
> > >>> clever enough to inject new packets (new conntracks) at the right
> > >>> moment, in the right hash chain, and this sounds so higly incredible
> > >>> that I cannot believe it at all :)
> > >>
> > >> Or maybe the DoS attack is injecting so many new conntracks that a large
> > >> fraction of the hash chains are being modified at any given time?
> > >>
> > 
> > I think its plausable, there is a lot of modification going on.
> > Approx 40.000 deletes/sec and 40.000 inserts/sec.
> > The hash bucket size is 300032, and with 80000 modifications/sec, we are 
> > (potentially) changing 26.6% of the hash chains each second.
> > 
> 
> OK but a lookup last a fraction of a micro second, unless interrupted by
> hard irq.
> 
> Probability of a change during a lookup should be very very small.
> 
> Note that the scenario for a restart is :
> 
> The lookup go through the chain.
> While it is examining one object, this object is deleted.
> The object is re-allocated by another cpu and inserted to a new chain.
> 
> 
> What exact version of kernel are you running ?
> 
> > As can be seen from the graphs:
> >   http://people.netfilter.org/hawk/DDoS/2010-04-12__001/list.html
> > 
> > Notice that primarily CPU2 is doing the 40k deletes/sec, while CPU1 is 
> > caught searching...
> > 
> > 
> > > maybe hash table has one slot :)
> > 
> > Guess I have to reproduce the DoS attack in a testlab (I will first have 
> > time Tuesday).  So we can determine if its bad hashing or restart of the 
> > search loop.
> > 

Or very long chains, if attacker managed to find a jhash flaw.

You could add a lookup_restart counter :


 include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h         |    1 +
 net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c |    7 ++++---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c                     |    4 +++-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c               |    7 ++++---
 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
index c608677..cf9a8df 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct ip_conntrack_stat {
 	unsigned int expect_new;
 	unsigned int expect_create;
 	unsigned int expect_delete;
+	unsigned int lookup_restart;
 };
 
 /* call to create an explicit dependency on nf_conntrack. */
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
index 2fb7b76..95f2227 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
@@ -336,12 +336,12 @@ static int ct_cpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	const struct ip_conntrack_stat *st = v;
 
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
-		seq_printf(seq, "entries  searched found new invalid ignore delete delete_list insert insert_failed drop early_drop icmp_error  expect_new expect_create expect_delete\n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "entries  searched found new invalid ignore delete delete_list insert insert_failed drop early_drop icmp_error  expect_new expect_create expect_delete lookup_restart\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
 	seq_printf(seq, "%08x  %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x "
-			"%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x  %08x %08x %08x \n",
+			"%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x  %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
 		   nr_conntracks,
 		   st->searched,
 		   st->found,
@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@ static int ct_cpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 		   st->expect_new,
 		   st->expect_create,
-		   st->expect_delete
+		   st->expect_delete,
+		   st->lookup_restart
 		);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 0c9bbe9..68e53f1 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -319,8 +319,10 @@ begin:
 	 * not the expected one, we must restart lookup.
 	 * We probably met an item that was moved to another chain.
 	 */
-	if (get_nulls_value(n) != hash)
+	if (unlikely(get_nulls_value(n) != hash)) {
+		NF_CT_STAT_INC(net, lookup_restart);
 		goto begin;
+	}
 	local_bh_enable();
 
 	return NULL;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
index faa8eb3..c8a286e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c
@@ -252,12 +252,12 @@ static int ct_cpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	const struct ip_conntrack_stat *st = v;
 
 	if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
-		seq_printf(seq, "entries  searched found new invalid ignore delete delete_list insert insert_failed drop early_drop icmp_error  expect_new expect_create expect_delete\n");
+		seq_printf(seq, "entries  searched found new invalid ignore delete delete_list insert insert_failed drop early_drop icmp_error  expect_new expect_create expect_delete lookup_restart\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
 	seq_printf(seq, "%08x  %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x %08x "
-			"%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x  %08x %08x %08x \n",
+			"%08x %08x %08x %08x %08x  %08x %08x %08x %08x\n",
 		   nr_conntracks,
 		   st->searched,
 		   st->found,
@@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ static int ct_cpu_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 
 		   st->expect_new,
 		   st->expect_create,
-		   st->expect_delete
+		   st->expect_delete,
+		   st->lookup_restart
 		);
 	return 0;
 }


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-22 21:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-22 12:58 DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-22 13:13 ` Changli Gao
2010-04-22 13:17   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-22 14:36     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 14:53       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 15:51         ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 16:02           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 16:34             ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-04-22 20:38             ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-22 21:03               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 21:14                 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-04-22 23:44                   ` David Miller
2010-04-23  5:44                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23  8:13                       ` David Miller
2010-04-23  8:18                         ` David Miller
2010-04-23  8:40                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23 10:36                   ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 11:06                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-22 21:28                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23  7:23                   ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-23  7:46                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23  7:55                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-23  9:23                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23 10:55                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 11:05                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-23 11:06                     ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 20:57               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-24 11:11                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-24 20:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-04-26 14:36                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-05-31 21:21                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01  0:28                         ` Changli Gao
2010-06-01  5:05                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01  5:48                             ` Changli Gao
2010-06-01 10:18                             ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-01 10:31                               ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-01 10:41                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-01 16:20                                   ` [RFC nf-next-2.6] conntrack: per cpu nf_conntrack_untracked Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 11:40                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-04 12:10                                       ` Changli Gao
2010-06-04 12:29                                         ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-04 12:36                                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 16:25                                             ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6] conntrack: IPS_UNTRACKED bit Eric Dumazet
2010-06-04 20:15                                               ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6 2/2] conntrack: per_cpu untracking Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 14:29                                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-08 14:52                                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 15:12                                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-09 12:45                                                       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-06-08 14:12                                               ` [PATCH nf-next-2.6] conntrack: IPS_UNTRACKED bit Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 10:56       ` DDoS attack causing bad effect on conntrack searches Patrick McHardy
2010-04-23 12:45         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23 13:57           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-04-22 13:31   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2010-04-23 10:35     ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1271970893.7895.6507.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hawk@comx.dk \
    --cc=hawk@diku.dk \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox