* Question about more headroom in skb
@ 2010-05-10 20:09 Sharat Masetty
2010-05-11 5:06 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Sharat Masetty @ 2010-05-10 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hello All,
For my project I need 3 words of headroom in the skb in the network driver level, to add a custom header to the ethernet packet. I looked into the tcp code and figured out tcp uses sk->sk_prot->max_header for header allocation size. But I was not able to confirm that all other transport protocol use the same mechanism(?) For example in UDP/ICMP I was not able to figure out from the code where the allocation and header reservation happens(Any light here would be really helpful.)
I have also looked at an API in skbuff skb_pad() which does what I want(add either headroom or tailroom), but I want to avoid that for performance reasons(skb_pad does kmalloc and memcpy). I want to figure out a good way(may be tune some parameters) to allocate extra 3 words for any skbuff independant of the transport protocol being used. Any light here would be very much appreciated.
Thanks,
Sharat.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about more headroom in skb
2010-05-10 20:09 Question about more headroom in skb Sharat Masetty
@ 2010-05-11 5:06 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2010-05-11 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sharat Masetty; +Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
Le lundi 10 mai 2010 à 13:09 -0700, Sharat Masetty a écrit :
> Hello All,
Please dont use too long lines
>
> For my project I need 3 words of headroom in the skb in the network
> driver level, to add a custom header to the ethernet packet. I
> looked into the tcp code and figured out tcp uses sk->sk_prot->max_header
> for header allocation size. But I was not able to confirm that all other
> transport protocol use the same mechanism(?) For example in UDP/ICMP I was
> not able to figure out from the code where the allocation and header
> reservation happens(Any light here would be really helpful.)
>
> I have also looked at an API in skbuff skb_pad() which does what I want
> (add either headroom or tailroom), but I want to avoid that for performance
> reasons(skb_pad does kmalloc and memcpy). I want to figure out a good way
> (may be tune some parameters) to allocate extra 3 words for any skbuff
> independant of the transport protocol being used.
> Any light here would be very much appreciated.
LL_RESERVED_SPACE() is the magic you need.
#define LL_RESERVED_SPACE(dev) \
((((dev)->hard_header_len+(dev)->needed_headroom)&~(HH_DATA_MOD - 1)) + HH_DATA_MOD)
sendmsg() -> ip_append_data()
...
hh_len = LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->u.dst.dev);
fragheaderlen = sizeof(struct iphdr) + (opt ? opt->optlen : 0);
...
if (transhdrlen) {
skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk,
alloclen + hh_len + 15,
(flags & MSG_DONTWAIT), &err);
} else {
skb = NULL;
if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) <=
2 * sk->sk_sndbuf)
skb = sock_wmalloc(sk,
alloclen + hh_len + 15, 1,
sk->sk_allocation);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-11 5:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-10 20:09 Question about more headroom in skb Sharat Masetty
2010-05-11 5:06 ` Eric Dumazet
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox