From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:18:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276006721.2486.141.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0D7312.1020300@intel.com>
Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 15:30 -0700, John Fastabend a écrit :
> There is always a possibility that the underlying device sets the
> queue_mapping to be greater then num_cpus. Also I suspect the same
> issue exists with bonding devices. Maybe something like the following
> is worth while? compile tested only,
>
> [PATCH] 8021q: vlan reassigns dev without check queue_mapping
>
> recv path reassigns skb->dev without sanity checking the
> queue_mapping field. This can result in the queue_mapping
> field being set incorrectly if the new dev supports less
> queues then the underlying device.
>
> This patch just resets the queue_mapping to 0 which should
> resolve this issue? Any thoughts?
>
> The same issue could happen on bonding devices as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> ---
>
> net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> index bd537fc..ad309f8 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct
> vlan_group *grp,
> if (!skb->dev)
> goto drop;
>
> + if (unlikely(skb->queue_mapping >= skb->dev->real_num_tx_queues))
> + skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, 0);
> +
> return (polling ? netif_receive_skb(skb) : netif_rx(skb));
>
> drop:
> @@ -93,6 +96,9 @@ vlan_gro_common(struct napi_struct *napi, struct
> vlan_group *grp,
> if (!skb->dev)
> goto drop;
>
> + if (unlikely(skb->queue_mapping >= skb->dev->real_num_tx_queues))
> + skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, 0);
> +
> for (p = napi->gro_list; p; p = p->next) {
> NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->same_flow =
> p->dev == skb->dev && !compare_ether_header(
> --
Only a workaround, added in hot path in a otherwise 'good' driver
(multiqueue enabled and ready)
eth0 -------> bond / bridge ---------> vlan.id
(nbtxq=8) (ntxbq=1) (nbtxq=X)
X is capped to 1 because of bond/bridge, while bond has no "queue"
(LLTX driver)
Solutions :
1) queue_mapping could be silently tested in get_rps_cpu()...
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 6f330ce..3a3f7f6 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2272,14 +2272,11 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
- if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
- if (net_ratelimit()) {
- pr_warning("%s received packet on queue "
- "%u, but number of RX queues is %u\n",
- dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues);
- }
- goto done;
- }
+ if (WARN_ONCE(index >= dev->num_rx_queues,
+ KERN_WARNING "%s received packet on queue %u, "
+ "but number of RX queues is %u\n",
+ dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues))
+ index %= dev->num_rx_queues;
rxqueue = dev->_rx + index;
} else
rxqueue = dev->_rx;
2) bond/bridge should setup more queues, just in case.
We probably need to be able to make things more dynamic,
(propagate nbtxq between layers) but not for 2.6.35
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 5e12462..ce813dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -5012,8 +5012,8 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name)
rtnl_lock();
- bond_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
- bond_setup);
+ bond_dev = alloc_netdev_mq(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
+ bond_setup, max(64, nr_cpu_ids));
if (!bond_dev) {
pr_err("%s: eek! can't alloc netdev!\n", name);
rtnl_unlock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-07 20:36 RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans Peter Lieven
2010-06-07 21:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-07 22:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 22:30 ` John Fastabend
2010-06-07 23:13 ` John Fastabend
2010-06-08 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-06-08 23:00 ` Tom Herbert
2010-06-08 23:58 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 1:08 ` John Fastabend
2010-06-09 1:52 ` Tom Herbert
2010-06-09 4:42 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276006721.2486.141.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pl@dlh.net \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox