Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:18:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276006721.2486.141.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0D7312.1020300@intel.com>

Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 15:30 -0700, John Fastabend a écrit :

> There is always a possibility that the underlying device sets the 
> queue_mapping to be greater then num_cpus.  Also I suspect the same 
> issue exists with bonding devices.  Maybe something like the following 
> is worth while? compile tested only,
> 
> [PATCH] 8021q: vlan reassigns dev without check queue_mapping
> 
> recv path reassigns skb->dev without sanity checking the
> queue_mapping field.  This can result in the queue_mapping
> field being set incorrectly if the new dev supports less
> queues then the underlying device.
> 
> This patch just resets the queue_mapping to 0 which should
> resolve this issue?  Any thoughts?
> 
> The same issue could happen on bonding devices as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
> ---
> 
>   net/8021q/vlan_core.c |    6 ++++++
>   1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> index bd537fc..ad309f8 100644
> --- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> +++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ int __vlan_hwaccel_rx(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> vlan_group *grp,
>   	if (!skb->dev)
>   		goto drop;
> 
> +	if (unlikely(skb->queue_mapping >= skb->dev->real_num_tx_queues))
> +		skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, 0);
> +
>   	return (polling ? netif_receive_skb(skb) : netif_rx(skb));
> 
>   drop:
> @@ -93,6 +96,9 @@ vlan_gro_common(struct napi_struct *napi, struct 
> vlan_group *grp,
>   	if (!skb->dev)
>   		goto drop;
> 
> +	if (unlikely(skb->queue_mapping >= skb->dev->real_num_tx_queues))
> +		skb_set_queue_mapping(skb, 0);
> +
>   	for (p = napi->gro_list; p; p = p->next) {
>   		NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->same_flow =
>   			p->dev == skb->dev && !compare_ether_header(
> --

Only a workaround, added in hot path in a otherwise 'good' driver
(multiqueue enabled and ready)

eth0  -------> bond / bridge ---------> vlan.id
(nbtxq=8)      (ntxbq=1)        (nbtxq=X)

X is capped to 1 because of bond/bridge, while bond has no "queue"
(LLTX driver)

Solutions :

1) queue_mapping could be silently tested in get_rps_cpu()...

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 6f330ce..3a3f7f6 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2272,14 +2272,11 @@ static int get_rps_cpu(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
 
 	if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
 		u16 index = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
-		if (unlikely(index >= dev->num_rx_queues)) {
-			if (net_ratelimit()) {
-				pr_warning("%s received packet on queue "
-					"%u, but number of RX queues is %u\n",
-					dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues);
-			}
-			goto done;
-		}
+		if (WARN_ONCE(index >= dev->num_rx_queues,
+				KERN_WARNING "%s received packet on queue %u, "
+				"but number of RX queues is %u\n",
+				dev->name, index, dev->num_rx_queues))
+			index %= dev->num_rx_queues;
 		rxqueue = dev->_rx + index;
 	} else
 		rxqueue = dev->_rx;



2) bond/bridge should setup more queues, just in case.
   We probably need to be able to make things more dynamic,
   (propagate nbtxq between layers) but not for 2.6.35



diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 5e12462..ce813dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -5012,8 +5012,8 @@ int bond_create(struct net *net, const char *name)
 
 	rtnl_lock();
 
-	bond_dev = alloc_netdev(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
-				bond_setup);
+	bond_dev = alloc_netdev_mq(sizeof(struct bonding), name ? name : "",
+				   bond_setup, max(64, nr_cpu_ids));
 	if (!bond_dev) {
 		pr_err("%s: eek! can't alloc netdev!\n", name);
 		rtnl_unlock();



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-08 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07 20:36 RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans Peter Lieven
2010-06-07 21:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-07 22:19   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 22:30   ` John Fastabend
2010-06-07 23:13     ` John Fastabend
2010-06-08 14:18     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-06-08 23:00       ` Tom Herbert
2010-06-08 23:58         ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-09  1:08           ` John Fastabend
2010-06-09  1:52             ` Tom Herbert
2010-06-09  4:42             ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1276006721.2486.141.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pl@dlh.net \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox