From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: "tim.gardner@canonical.com" <tim.gardner@canonical.com>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:42:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276058553.2439.469.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0EE99B.8030300@intel.com>
Le mardi 08 juin 2010 à 18:08 -0700, John Fastabend a écrit :
>
> The bonding driver is already multiq per Andy Gospodarek's patch commit bb1d912,
> but unless the bond and bridge devices use the max num_rx_queues of there
> underlying devices this could still go wrong.
>
This patch is in net-next-2.6, it is not scheduled for 2.6.35
We need some fix for 2.6.35
> The bonding driver would possibly need to increase num_rx_queues and
> num_tx_queues when a device is enslaved or be set to some maximum at init for
> this to work right.
Thats a bit complex and definitly not 2.6.35 material.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-07 20:36 RFS seems to have incompatiblities with bridged vlans Peter Lieven
2010-06-07 21:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-06-07 22:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-07 22:30 ` John Fastabend
2010-06-07 23:13 ` John Fastabend
2010-06-08 14:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-06-08 23:00 ` Tom Herbert
2010-06-08 23:58 ` Tim Gardner
2010-06-09 1:08 ` John Fastabend
2010-06-09 1:52 ` Tom Herbert
2010-06-09 4:42 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1276058553.2439.469.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pl@dlh.net \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=tim.gardner@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox