From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Felipe W Damasio <felipewd@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign_sock() can handle tw sockets
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:17:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1278742649.2538.17.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil39xHOhcdAo4h_jWtx_UuYdFHGdQVAdwPMd7QJ@mail.gmail.com>
Le samedi 10 juillet 2010 à 00:18 -0300, Felipe W Damasio a écrit :
> Hi Mr. Dumazet,
>
> 2010/7/9 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>:
> > Reviewing tproxy stuff I spotted a problem in nf_tproxy_assign_sock()
> > but I could not see how it could explain your crash.
> >
> > We can read uninitialized memory and trigger a fault in
> > nf_tproxy_assign_sock(), not later in tcp_recvmsg()...
> >
> > David, Patrick, what do you think ?
>
> But do you think that the bug that squid triggered was caused by the
> TProxy code?
>
I dont think so, but I was asking David or Patrick another point of
view.
Strange thing with your crash report is CR2 value, with unexpected value
of 000000000b388000 while RAX value is dce8dce85d415d41
Faulting instruction is :
48 83 b8 b0 00 00 00 00 cmpq $0x0,0xb0(%rax)
So I would have expected CR2 being RAX+0xb0, but its not.
> Or is related to the network-stack in some other point.
>
> I don't know if this helps, but I'm using ebtables to remove the
> packets from the bridge, and iptables to redirect the traffic to
> squid.
>
> ebtables rules are:
>
> -p IPv4 -i eth0 --ip-proto tcp --ip-dport 80 -j redirect --redirect-target DROP
> -p IPv4 -i eth1 --ip-proto tcp --ip-sport 80 -j redirect --redirect-target DROP
>
>
> iptables -t mangle -L -n is:
>
> iptables -t mangle -L -n
> Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT)
> target prot opt source destination
> DIVERT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 socket
> extrachain tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp
> dpt:80 ctstate NEW
> TPROXY tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 !201.40.162.5 tcp
> dpt:80 connmark match 0x0 TPROXY redirect 127.0.0.1:3127 mark 0x1/0x1
> TPROXY tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 !201.40.162.5 tcp
> dpt:80 connmark match 0x1 TPROXY redirect 127.0.0.1:3128 mark 0x1/0x1
> TPROXY tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 !201.40.162.5 tcp
> dpt:80 connmark match 0x2 TPROXY redirect 127.0.0.1:3129 mark 0x1/0x1
>
> Chain DIVERT (1 references)
> target prot opt source destination
> MARK all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 MARK xset
> 0x1/0xffffffff
> ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
>
> Chain extrachain (1 references)
> target prot opt source destination
> CONNMARK all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 statistic
> mode nth every 35 CONNMARK and 0x0
> CONNMARK all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 statistic
> mode nth every 35 packet 1 CONNMARK xset 0x1/0xffffffff
> CONNMARK all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 statistic
> mode nth every 35 packet 2 CONNMARK xset 0x2/0xffffffff
>
> Don't know if the code on these can be traced back to tcp_recvmsg()
> accessing some wrong memory address...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Felipe Damasio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-10 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AANLkTimn8A0cYZmwNZYitRkBHKKFe4HQ5GU626DLugkk@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-08 22:06 ` Squid hang up on 2.6.34 Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <AANLkTil49m6Ul2bauiH4Pwn-6ykrYTFmSO6_SxqQgD_e@mail.gmail.com>
2010-07-08 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-09 15:03 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-09 16:03 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-09 17:13 ` [PATCH] tproxy: nf_tproxy_assign_sock() can handle tw sockets Eric Dumazet
2010-07-09 17:53 ` David Miller
2010-07-09 18:16 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-10 3:18 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-10 6:17 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-07-10 19:30 ` David Miller
2010-07-11 3:11 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-11 7:11 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-11 7:13 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-11 8:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-11 5:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-07-11 8:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-12 0:52 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-12 18:49 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-13 14:24 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-13 14:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-13 14:49 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-13 15:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-13 20:55 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-13 21:06 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-14 3:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-14 3:27 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-14 3:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-14 3:51 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-14 6:56 ` Bill Fink
2010-07-16 15:41 ` Felipe W Damasio
2010-07-16 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-07-14 11:41 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1278742649.2538.17.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=felipewd@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox