From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@broadcom.com>,
Vladislav Zolotarov <vladz@broadcom.com>,
Yaniv Rosner <yanivr@broadcom.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Subject: [BUG net-next] bnx2x: all traffic comes to RX queue 0
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:07:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286899657.2732.93.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1286838210.30423.128.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Hmm, while doing tests for the netdev_alloc_skb() problem, I found
current net-next tree is not really multi queue enabled...
ethtool -S eth1|grep _ucast
[0]: rx_ucast_packets: 3507786
[0]: tx_ucast_packets: 416925
[1]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[1]: tx_ucast_packets: 4
[2]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[2]: tx_ucast_packets: 397467
[3]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[3]: tx_ucast_packets: 75832
[4]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[4]: tx_ucast_packets: 171025
[5]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[5]: tx_ucast_packets: 233025
[6]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[6]: tx_ucast_packets: 250358
[7]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[7]: tx_ucast_packets: 240792
[8]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[8]: tx_ucast_packets: 216366
[9]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[9]: tx_ucast_packets: 1
[10]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[10]: tx_ucast_packets: 350324
[11]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[11]: tx_ucast_packets: 92403
[12]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[12]: tx_ucast_packets: 307678
[13]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[13]: tx_ucast_packets: 314315
[14]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[14]: tx_ucast_packets: 256767
[15]: rx_ucast_packets: 0
[15]: tx_ucast_packets: 185105
rx_ucast_packets: 3507786
tx_ucast_packets: 3508387
# ethtool -i eth1
driver: bnx2x
version: 1.60.00-1
firmware-version: bc 4.8.0 phy baa0.105
bus-info: 0000:02:00.1
02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM57711E
10Gigabit PCIe
Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NC532i Dual Port 10GbE Multifunction
BL-C Adapter
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 47
Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8M]
Memory at f9800000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8M]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at e7010000 [disabled] [size=64K]
Capabilities: [48] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [50] Vital Product Data
Capabilities: [58] MSI: Enable- Count=1/8 Maskable- 64bit+
Capabilities: [a0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=17 Masked-
Capabilities: [ac] Express Endpoint, MSI 00
Capabilities: [100] Device Serial Number f4-ce-46-ff-fe-bb-32-d4
Capabilities: [110] Advanced Error Reporting
Capabilities: [150] Power Budgeting <?>
Capabilities: [160] Virtual Channel <?>
Kernel driver in use: bnx2x
Kernel modules: bnx2x
Any idea before a biscection ?
Thanks !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-12 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 23:03 [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: dont use netdev_alloc_skb() Eric Dumazet
2010-10-11 23:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 5:03 ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-12 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 9:12 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
2010-10-14 17:39 ` David Miller
2010-10-14 18:17 ` Eilon Greenstein
2010-10-14 18:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-14 18:25 ` David Miller
2010-10-14 18:17 ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-12 5:05 ` [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 5:35 ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-12 6:03 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-12 6:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-12 7:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 7:58 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-12 11:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-12 12:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-12 19:43 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 6:17 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-13 6:31 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 6:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-13 16:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-13 20:48 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-13 21:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-13 22:41 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-14 6:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-10-14 7:23 ` David Rientjes
2010-10-15 14:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-14 15:31 ` Tom Herbert
2010-10-14 16:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-15 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-10-14 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-10-14 19:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-16 18:54 ` David Miller
2010-10-12 16:07 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-12 16:20 ` [BUG net-next] bnx2x: all traffic comes to RX queue 0 Dmitry Kravkov
2010-10-12 18:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-12 18:18 ` Vladislav Zolotarov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286899657.2732.93.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry@broadcom.com \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladz@broadcom.com \
--cc=yanivr@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox