From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] af_unix: fix unix_dgram_poll() behavior for EPOLLOUT event
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:36:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1288539383.2660.38.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101030224703.065e70f6@chocolatine.cbg.collabora.co.uk>
Le samedi 30 octobre 2010 à 22:47 +0100, Alban Crequy a écrit :
> Le Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:17:58 +0200,
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > > Problem is the peer_wait, that epoll doesnt seem to be plugged into.
> > >
> > > Bug is in unix_dgram_poll()
> > >
> > > It calls sock_poll_wait( ... &unix_sk(other)->peer_wait,) only if
> > > socket is 'writable'. Its a clear bug
>
> Yes, it looks weird...
>
> > > Try this patch please ?
>
> I will be away from computer and I will continue to work on this from
> the 20th of November.
OK, no problem. I tried it and it solves the problem. Here is an
official patch submission.
David, for your convenience, I cooked a patch serie for the 2 patches
against af_unix unix_dgram_poll().
The third patch (af_unix: unix_write_space() use keyed wakeups)) can be
applied as is.
Thanks !
[PATCH 1/2] af_unix: fix unix_dgram_poll() behavior for EPOLLOUT event
Alban Crequy reported a problem with connected dgram af_unix sockets and
provided a test program. epoll() would miss to send an EPOLLOUT event
when a thread unqueues a packet from the other peer, making its receive
queue not full.
This is because unix_dgram_poll() fails to call sock_poll_wait(file,
&unix_sk(other)->peer_wait, wait);
if the socket is not writeable at the time epoll_ctl(ADD) is called.
We must call sock_poll_wait(), regardless of 'writable' status, so that
epoll can be notified later of states changes.
Misc: avoids testing twice (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
Reported-by: Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 0ebc777..7375131 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2072,13 +2072,12 @@ static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
if (sk->sk_err || !skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_error_queue))
mask |= POLLERR;
if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
- mask |= POLLRDHUP;
+ mask |= POLLRDHUP | POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
if (sk->sk_shutdown == SHUTDOWN_MASK)
mask |= POLLHUP;
/* readable? */
- if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
- (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN))
+ if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
/* Connection-based need to check for termination and startup */
@@ -2090,20 +2089,15 @@ static unsigned int unix_dgram_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
return mask;
}
- /* writable? */
writable = unix_writable(sk);
- if (writable) {
- other = unix_peer_get(sk);
- if (other) {
- if (unix_peer(other) != sk) {
- sock_poll_wait(file, &unix_sk(other)->peer_wait,
- wait);
- if (unix_recvq_full(other))
- writable = 0;
- }
-
- sock_put(other);
+ other = unix_peer_get(sk);
+ if (other) {
+ if (unix_peer(other) != sk) {
+ sock_poll_wait(file, &unix_sk(other)->peer_wait, wait);
+ if (unix_recvq_full(other))
+ writable = 0;
}
+ sock_put(other);
}
if (writable)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-31 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-29 18:18 [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets Alban Crequy
2010-10-29 18:21 ` [PATCH] " Alban Crequy
2010-10-29 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: " Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-10-29 20:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 20:46 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-10-29 21:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-29 21:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-10-29 22:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-30 9:53 ` [PATCH] af_unix: optimize unix_dgram_poll() Eric Dumazet
2010-10-30 17:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-10-29 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets Jesper Juhl
2010-10-29 20:40 ` David Miller
2010-10-29 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-30 6:44 ` [PATCH] af_unix: unix_write_space() use keyed wakeups Eric Dumazet
2010-10-30 15:03 ` Davide Libenzi
2010-11-08 21:44 ` David Miller
2010-10-30 21:36 ` Alban Crequy
[not found] ` <1290554876.2158.5.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1>
2010-11-24 0:20 ` Alban Crequy
2010-11-24 0:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-30 11:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] RFC: poll/select performance on datagram sockets Alban Crequy
2010-10-30 12:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-10-30 13:17 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <20101030224703.065e70f6@chocolatine.cbg.collabora.co.uk>
2010-10-31 15:36 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-10-31 19:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] af_unix: fix unix_dgram_poll() behavior for EPOLLOUT event Davide Libenzi
2010-11-08 21:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1288539383.2660.38.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alban.crequy@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox