From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:40:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292431256.3427.358.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292430424.3427.350.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Le mercredi 15 décembre 2010 à 17:27 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Hmm, you may be right, thanks a lot for reviewing !
>
> I noticed that with normal quantum (1514), my SFQ setup was sending two
> full frames per flow after my patch, so was about to prepare a new
> version ;)
>
> I'll post a v2 shortly.
Indeed, the missing init in sfq_enqueue() is enough to solve the
problem :
[PATCH v2] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling
When deploying SFQ/IFB here at work, I found the allot management was
pretty wrong in sfq, even changing allot from short to int...
We should init allot for each new flow, not using a previous value found
in slot.
Before patch, I saw bursts of several packets per flow, apparently
denying the default "quantum 1514" limit I had on my SFQ class.
class sfq 11:1 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 7p requeues 0
allot 11546
class sfq 11:46 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 1p requeues 0
allot -23873
class sfq 11:78 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 5p requeues 0
allot 11393
After patch, better fairness among each flow, allot limit being
respected.
class sfq 11:2e4 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 4p requeues 0
allot -1166
class sfq 11:2f7 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 3p requeues 0
allot -1166
class sfq 11:313 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 3p requeues 0
allot -1220
class sfq 11:335 parent 11:
(dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
backlog 0b 4p requeues 0
allot -1166
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
net/sched/sch_sfq.c | 5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 3cf478d..065a2a5 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -321,14 +321,13 @@ sfq_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *sch)
sfq_inc(q, x);
if (q->qs[x].qlen == 1) { /* The flow is new */
if (q->tail == SFQ_DEPTH) { /* It is the first flow */
- q->tail = x;
q->next[x] = x;
- q->allot[x] = q->quantum;
} else {
q->next[x] = q->next[q->tail];
q->next[q->tail] = x;
- q->tail = x;
}
+ q->tail = x;
+ q->allot[x] = q->quantum;
}
if (++sch->q.qlen <= q->limit) {
sch->bstats.bytes += qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-15 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-15 14:03 [PATCH] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 16:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 16:40 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-15 16:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 16:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 17:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 17:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 17:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 17:30 ` [PATCH v3] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 18:18 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net_sched: sch_sfq: add backlog info in sfq_dump_class_stats() Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 19:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 8:16 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-16 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 11:03 ` [PATCH " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 13:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-20 21:14 ` David Miller
2010-12-20 21:18 ` [PATCH v3] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling David Miller
2010-12-16 13:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-17 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH] net_sched: sch_sfq: better struct layouts Eric Dumazet
2010-12-19 21:22 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-20 17:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-20 21:33 ` David Miller
2010-12-20 21:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-20 22:54 ` [PATCH v3 net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 5:33 ` David Miller
2010-12-20 22:55 ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-20 23:16 ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] sch_sfq: allow big packets and be fair Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 10:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 10:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 10:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 10:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 10:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 11:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 12:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 13:04 ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 13:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-28 21:46 ` David Miller
2010-12-29 7:53 ` [PATCH v3 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-31 20:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1292431256.3427.358.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox