public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:08:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292504932.2883.110.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D08F4F4.3050501@trash.net>

Le mercredi 15 décembre 2010 à 18:03 +0100, Patrick McHardy a écrit :
> On 15.12.2010 17:55, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> > I was thinking in allowing more packets per SFQ (but keep the 126 active
> > flows limit), what do you think ?
> 
> I keep forgetting why this limit exists, let me try to figure
> it out once more :)

I took a look, and found we already are at max, unless we change
sfq_index type (from u8 to u16)

SFQ_SLOTS is 128  (not really exist, but this is the number of slots)
SFQ_DEPTH is 128 (max depth for one slot)
Constraints are :
 SFQ_SLOTS < 256
 SFQ_DEPTH < 256
 SFQ_SLOTS + SFQ_DEPTH < 256, because of the dep[] array.

We could avoid the "struct sk_buff_head" structure with its un-needed
spinlock, and eventually group data for a given slot in a structure to
reduce number of cache lines we touch...

struct sfq_slot {
	struct sk_buff *first;
	struct sk_buff *last;
	u8 qlen;
	sfq_index next; /* dequeue chain */
	u16 hash;
	short allot;
	/* 16bit hole */
};

This would save 768 bytes on x86_64 (and much more if LOCKDEP is used)




  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-16 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-15 14:03 [PATCH] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 16:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 16:27   ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 16:40     ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 16:43       ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 16:55         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 17:03           ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 17:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 17:21               ` Patrick McHardy
2010-12-15 17:30                 ` [PATCH v3] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 18:18                   ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net_sched: sch_sfq: add backlog info in sfq_dump_class_stats() Eric Dumazet
2010-12-15 19:10                     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16  8:16                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-16 10:18                       ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 11:03                       ` [PATCH " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-16 13:09                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-20 21:14                     ` David Miller
2010-12-20 21:18                   ` [PATCH v3] net_sched: sch_sfq: fix allot handling David Miller
2010-12-16 13:08             ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-12-17 16:52               ` [RFC PATCH] net_sched: sch_sfq: better struct layouts Eric Dumazet
2010-12-19 21:22                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-20 17:02                   ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-20 21:33                     ` David Miller
2010-12-20 21:42                       ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-20 22:54                         ` [PATCH v3 net-next-2.6] " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21  5:33                           ` David Miller
2010-12-20 22:55                     ` [PATCH v2] " Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-20 23:16                     ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] sch_sfq: allow big packets and be fair Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 10:15                       ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 10:30                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 10:44                           ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 10:56                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 10:57                         ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 11:39                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 12:17                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-21 13:04                               ` [PATCH v2 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-21 13:47                                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2010-12-28 21:46                                 ` David Miller
2010-12-29  7:53                                   ` [PATCH v3 " Eric Dumazet
2010-12-31 20:48                                     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292504932.2883.110.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox