From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: rick.jones2@hp.com
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@infradead.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
Bill Sommerfeld <wsommerfeld@google.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel?
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:21:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298661686.2659.106.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1298661495.14113.152.camel@tardy>
Le vendredi 25 février 2011 à 11:18 -0800, Rick Jones a écrit :
> I think the idea is goodness, but will ask, was the (first) bottleneck
> actually in the kernel, or was it in bind itself? I've seen
> single-instance, single-byte burst-mode netperf TCP_RR do in excess of
> 300K transactions per second (with TCP_NODELAY set) on an X5560 core.
>
> ftp://ftp.netperf.org/netperf/misc/dl380g6_X5560_rhel54_ad386_cxgb3_1.4.1.2_b2b_to_same_agg_1500mtu_20100513-2.csv
>
> and that was with now ancient RHEL5.4 bits... yes, there is a bit of
> apples, oranges and kumquats but still, I am wondering if this didn't
> also "work around" some internal BIND scaling issues as well.
>
A single core can probably give 300K transactions.
But if you use several cores, accessing a single socket (the one bound
on port 53), then performance drops because of false sharing,
locking....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-25 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-27 10:07 SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel? Daniel Baluta
2011-01-27 15:55 ` Bill Sommerfeld
2011-01-27 21:32 ` Tom Herbert
2011-02-25 12:56 ` Thomas Graf
2011-02-25 19:18 ` Rick Jones
2011-02-25 19:20 ` David Miller
2011-02-26 0:57 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-26 2:12 ` David Miller
2011-02-26 2:48 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-26 3:07 ` David Miller
2011-02-26 3:11 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-26 7:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-26 7:46 ` David Miller
2011-02-27 11:02 ` Thomas Graf
2011-02-27 11:06 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-28 3:45 ` Tom Herbert
2011-02-28 4:26 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-28 11:36 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-28 13:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 14:13 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-28 14:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 14:25 ` Herbert Xu
2011-02-28 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 15:01 ` Thomas Graf
2011-02-28 14:13 ` Thomas Graf
2011-02-28 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 16:37 ` Thomas Graf
2011-02-28 17:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 10:19 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 10:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 11:07 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 11:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 11:27 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 11:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 11:53 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 12:32 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 13:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 13:11 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 13:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 13:18 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 13:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 13:58 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 16:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 0:23 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 2:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 2:39 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 2:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 3:09 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 3:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 7:12 ` Tom Herbert
2011-03-02 7:31 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 8:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02 8:07 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 8:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 12:01 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 12:15 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 13:27 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 12:18 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 12:19 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 13:50 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 14:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 14:22 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 14:30 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 14:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 15:07 ` Thomas Graf
2011-03-01 5:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 12:35 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 12:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] inet: Add ip_make_skb and ip_finish_skb Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 12:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] inet: Remove explicit write references to sk/inet in ip_append_data Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 6:15 ` inet: Replace left-over references to inet->cork Herbert Xu
2011-03-02 7:01 ` David Miller
2011-03-01 12:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] inet: Remove unused sk_sndmsg_* from UFO Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 12:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] udp: Add lockless transmit path Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 12:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] udp: Switch to ip_finish_skb Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 16:43 ` SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel? Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 20:36 ` David Miller
2011-02-28 11:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] net: Remove explicit write references to sk/inet in ip_append_data Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 5:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 11:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] net: Remove unused sk_sndmsg_* from UFO Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 5:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 11:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] udp: Add lockless transmit path Herbert Xu
2011-02-28 11:41 ` Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 5:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 11:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] inet: Add ip_make_skb and ip_send_skb Herbert Xu
2011-03-01 5:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-25 19:21 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-02-25 22:48 ` SO_REUSEPORT - can it be done in kernel? Thomas Graf
2011-02-25 23:15 ` Rick Jones
2011-02-25 19:51 ` Tom Herbert
2011-02-25 22:58 ` Thomas Graf
2011-02-25 23:33 ` Bill Sommerfeld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298661686.2659.106.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.baluta@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
--cc=tgraf@infradead.org \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=wsommerfeld@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox