public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scalability of interface creation and deletion
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 18:26:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304785589.3207.5.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0F4A638C2A523577CDBC295E@Ximines.local>

Le samedi 07 mai 2011 à 16:26 +0100, Alex Bligh a écrit :

> On the current 8 core box I am testing, I see 280ms per interface
> delete **even with only 10 interfaces**. I see 260ms with one
> interface. I know doing lots of rcu sync stuff can be slow, but
> 260ms to remove one veth pair sounds like more than rcu sync going
> on. It sounds like a sleep (though I may not have found the
> right one). I see no CPU load.
> 

Here, on 2.6.38 kernel (Ubuntu 11.04 provided, on my 2 core laptop)

# time rmmod dummy

real	0m0.111s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.000s


This removed my two dummy0/dummy1 devices.

On another machine with a very recent kernel :
$ modprobe dummy numdummies=1
$ ifconfig dummy0 192.168.46.46 up
$ time rmmod dummy

real	0m0.032s
user	0m0.000s
sys	0m0.001s
$ uname -a
Linux svivoipvnx001 2.6.39-rc6-00097-g6ac1576-dirty #550 SMP Sat May 7
00:12:26 CEST 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux


So 260ms is a bit too much, maybe you hit yet another bug.





  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-07 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-07 11:08 Scalability of interface creation and deletion Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 12:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 15:26   ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 15:54     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 16:23       ` Ben Greear
2011-05-07 16:37         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 16:44           ` Ben Greear
2011-05-07 16:51             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08  3:45               ` Ben Greear
2011-05-08  8:08                 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-09 21:46       ` Octavian Purdila
2011-05-07 16:26     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-05-07 18:24       ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:32         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:39           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08 10:09             ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:42           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:50             ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08  7:12             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-08  8:06               ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08  9:35               ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:18                 ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:50                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 13:13                     ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 13:44                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 14:27                         ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 14:47                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 15:17                             ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 15:48                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 21:00                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  4:44                                   ` [PATCH] veth: use batched device unregister Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  6:56                                     ` Michał Mirosław
2011-05-09  8:20                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  9:17                                         ` [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: use batched device unregister in veth and macvlan Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 18:42                                           ` David Miller
2011-05-09 19:05                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09 20:17                                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10  6:40                                                 ` [PATCH net-2.6] vlan: fix GVRP at dismantle time Eric Dumazet
2011-05-10 19:23                                                   ` David Miller
2011-05-09  7:45                                     ` [PATCH v2 net-next-2.6] veth: use batched device unregister Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  9:22                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  5:37                                   ` Scalability of interface creation and deletion Alex Bligh
2011-05-09  6:37                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-09  7:11                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-09 17:30                                   ` Jesse Gross
2011-05-08 12:44                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-08 13:06                   ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 13:14                     ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-08 12:32               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-07 18:51           ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 19:24             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-05-07 18:38       ` Alex Bligh
2011-05-07 18:44         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1304785589.3207.5.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=alex@alex.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox