From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "Alexey Zaytsev" <alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com>,
"Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Gary Zambrano" <zambrano@broadcom.com>,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Pekka Pietikainen" <pp@ee.oulu.fi>,
"Florian Schirmer" <jolt@tuxbox.org>,
"Felix Fietkau" <nbd@openwrt.org>,
"Michael Buesch" <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 38102] New: BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison overwritten
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:13:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309889634.2545.2.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110705180650.GF2959@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 14:06 -0400, Neil Horman a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:47:21PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 12:42 -0400, Neil Horman a écrit :
> > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 06:12:32PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > > > So all descriptors before prod are guaranteed to be ready for host
> > > > consume... Fact that a dma access is running on 'next descriptor' should
> > > > be irrelevant.
> > > >
> > > But we handle more than one descriptor per b44_rx call - theres a while loop in
> > > there where we do advance to the next descriptor.
> >
> > Yes, but we advance up to 'prod', which is the very last safe
> > descriptor.
> >
> > If hardware advertises descriptor X being ready to be handled by host,
> > while DMA on this X descriptor is not yet finished, this would be a
> > really useless hardware ;)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
>
>
> Something else just jumped out at me. During b44_open, we call b44_init_rings.
> This function allocates bp->rx_pending skb's and iteratively puts them in the rx
> dma ring. bp->rx_pending is initalized to B44_DEF_RX_RING_PENDING, which is
> defined as 200 (just about half of the 512 entries that the dma ring actually
> supports in the hardware. This is normally ok, as subsequent calls to
> b44_alloc_rx_skb will fill in entries in the ring as those skbs are consumed.
> The problem with this however is that b44_alloc_rx_skb only sets the
> DESC_CTRL_EOT bit in the descriptor of the 512th entry, indicating that the
> hardware should wrap around and reset the index counter. If a large volume of
> traffic is pushed through the adapter early on after initalization, or if the
> cpu is busy during init, it would be possible that the ring buffer would fill up
> prior to having additional entries added to the ring, the result being that the
> dma engine would reach the end of the allocated descriptors, not see an EOT bit
> set, and continue on using unallocated descriptors.
>
> Just a theory, but it would be interesting to see if the problem subsided if you
> ensured that you allocated a full descriptor ring on b44_open
> Neil
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/b44.c b/drivers/net/b44.c
> index 3d247f3..1b58a7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/b44.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/b44.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
> #define B44_MAX_MTU 1500
>
> #define B44_RX_RING_SIZE 512
> -#define B44_DEF_RX_RING_PENDING 200
> +#define B44_DEF_RX_RING_PENDING 512
> #define B44_RX_RING_BYTES (sizeof(struct dma_desc) * \
> B44_RX_RING_SIZE)
> #define B44_TX_RING_SIZE 512
No
Please take time to read the driver again.
200 desc are setup, and NIC is not allowed to use more than 200 descs.
( B44_DMARX_PTR )
We carefuly advance this pointer after a new desc(s) is(are) setup
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-38102-10286@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2011-06-29 21:51 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 38102] New: BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison overwritten Andrew Morton
2011-07-01 6:01 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-02 21:25 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-03 15:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 11:48 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-04 13:05 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-04 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 14:27 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-04 14:43 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-04 14:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 15:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 20:25 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-04 22:29 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 3:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 3:56 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 4:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 4:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 4:17 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 4:18 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 4:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 4:29 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 4:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 4:57 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 5:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 5:18 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-05 5:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 16:05 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-05 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 16:27 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-05 16:42 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-05 16:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 16:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 17:01 ` Joe Perches
2011-07-05 17:21 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-05 18:06 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-05 18:13 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-07-05 18:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 18:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 19:53 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-05 20:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 20:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 22:06 ` Neil Horman
2011-07-06 15:32 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-06 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-06 16:12 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-06 16:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-06 16:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-07 6:32 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-07 6:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-07 7:45 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-07 9:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-07 9:34 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-07 9:37 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-07 9:43 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2011-07-07 9:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-05 4:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 14:31 ` Michael Büsch
2011-07-04 14:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-04 14:51 ` Michael Büsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309889634.2545.2.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexey.zaytsev@gmail.com \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jolt@tuxbox.org \
--cc=m@bues.ch \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pp@ee.oulu.fi \
--cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox