Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	"sfr@canb.auug.org.au" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] tcp: potential bug in tcp_is_sackblock_valid()
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:35:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316374544.31335.16.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E696FD0.7060702@intel.com>

Le vendredi 09 septembre 2011 à 09:45 +0800, Yan, Zheng a écrit :
> Hi all,
> 
> I found a check in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() is suspicious. It against
> its comment and RFC. I think the correct check should be:
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 385c470..a5d01b1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static int tcp_is_sackblock_valid(struct tcp_sock *tp, int is_dsack,
>                 return 0;
>  
>         /* ...Then it's D-SACK, and must reside below snd_una completely */
> -       if (!after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
> +       if (after(end_seq, tp->snd_una))
>                 return 0;
>  
>         if (!before(start_seq, tp->undo_marker))
> ---

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>

This bug was introduced in 2.6.24 by commit 5b3c9882

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-18 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-09  1:45 [BUG?] tcp: potential bug in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() Yan, Zheng
2011-09-09  1:54 ` Herbert Xu
2011-09-09  2:10   ` Yan, Zheng
2011-09-09  8:03     ` Ilpo Järvinen
     [not found]       ` <CAA93jw7L9KyXVevZ8dqE+ExLYP9=CLMmj1gPD88ihBuC6ZovOQ@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-18 20:39         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-18 21:04           ` Dave Taht
2011-09-18 21:20             ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-09-18 19:35 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2011-09-19  1:07   ` David Miller
2011-09-19  2:05     ` [PATCH] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK Yan, Zheng
2011-09-19  2:37       ` David Miller
2011-09-19 17:29         ` Jan Ceuleers
2011-09-20 18:50           ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1316374544.31335.16.camel@edumazet-laptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox