From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
alekcejk@googlemail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:00:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1329292820.2555.47.camel@edumazet-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120215025200.6e6f02a2.billfink@mindspring.com>
Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 02:52 -0500, Bill Fink a écrit :
> Would it be useful to check if there was any difference in
> TCP parameters between the 3.1 and 3.2 kernels by performing
> the following on each:
>
> grep . /sys/module/tcp_*/parameters/*
>
> -Bill
I did yesterday and found nothing interesting.
# diff SYSCTL1 SYSCTL2
13a14
> kernel.sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice_us = 5000
18c19
< kernel.tainted = 513
---
> kernel.tainted = 4609
33c34
< kernel.threads-max = 48402
---
> kernel.threads-max = 48398
35c36
< kernel.random.entropy_avail = 2200
---
> kernel.random.entropy_avail = 1715
38,39c39,40
< kernel.random.boot_id = da6427fc-eb8e-40a8-8809-8cae94a65fb5
< kernel.random.uuid = 118c4362-a2a2-4973-ab3e-a09a0ed306ff
---
> kernel.random.boot_id = 2f77031a-9e65-4358-9c02-09058831507a
> kernel.random.uuid = 44cdd730-9c00-4a85-87c3-0a5b1c7c1278
52a54
> kernel.cap_last_cap = 35
102,103c104,105
< kernel.osrelease = 2.6.41.10-3.fc15.i686
< kernel.version = #1 SMP Mon Jan 23 15:44:18 UTC 2012
---
> kernel.osrelease = 2.6.42.3-2.fc15.i686
> kernel.version = #1 SMP Thu Feb 9 01:39:19 UTC 2012
111c113
< kernel.msgmni = 1675
---
> kernel.msgmni = 1674
116c118
< kernel.pty.nr = 2
---
> kernel.pty.nr = 3
152,155c154,157
< fs.inode-nr = 9875 61
< fs.inode-state = 9875 61 0 0 0 0 0
< fs.file-nr = 7328 0 309733
< fs.file-max = 309733
---
> fs.inode-nr = 23853 1607
> fs.inode-state = 23853 1607 0 0 0 0 0
> fs.file-nr = 6112 0 309720
> fs.file-max = 309720
157c159
< fs.dentry-state = 9913 1327 45 0 0 0
---
> fs.dentry-state = 27730 17922 45 0 0 0
168c170
< fs.epoll.max_user_watches = 337762
---
> fs.epoll.max_user_watches = 337644
272c274
< net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_count = 62
---
> net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_count = 26
284,285c286,287
< net.core.wmem_default = 114688
< net.core.rmem_default = 114688
---
> net.core.wmem_default = 163840
> net.core.rmem_default = 163840
301d302
< net.ipv4.route.gc_interval = 60
601c602
< net.ipv6.conf.all.regen_max_retry = 5
---
> net.ipv6.conf.all.regen_max_retry = 3
630c631
< net.ipv6.conf.default.regen_max_retry = 5
---
> net.ipv6.conf.default.regen_max_retry = 3
659c660
< net.ipv6.conf.lo.regen_max_retry = 5
---
> net.ipv6.conf.lo.regen_max_retry = 3
688c689
< net.ipv6.conf.eth0.regen_max_retry = 5
---
> net.ipv6.conf.eth0.regen_max_retry = 3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 20:04 limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels alekcejk
2012-02-13 20:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:58 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 22:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-13 23:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 23:24 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 3:06 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-14 3:26 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 14:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 21:16 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 4:21 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 17:19 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 18:53 ` alekcejk
2012-02-22 1:26 ` alekcejk
[not found] ` <1920135.kl3o7Tt79c@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1329228798.4818.0.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
2012-02-14 14:28 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 16:43 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 4:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 6:03 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 7:52 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-02-15 8:18 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:43 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:11 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 14:49 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 15:05 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 19:44 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 16:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 17:01 ` David Miller
2012-02-16 17:22 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 17:54 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 18:19 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 21:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 21:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 22:08 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 22:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-17 16:41 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-21 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 19:11 ` David Miller
2012-02-22 5:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-22 7:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 18:39 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-23 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-27 19:39 ` David Miller
2012-02-17 16:55 ` Re: " Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 18:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1329292820.2555.47.camel@edumazet-laptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alekcejk@googlemail.com \
--cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox