From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb: reduce Rx header size
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:52:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343922767.9299.234.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501AA00E.3010400@intel.com>
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 08:43 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> Would there be any problems with us running this through Jeff's tree for
> testing prior to applying this? I'm just wanting to do some testing
> internally for any performance regressions due to this change.
Sure, I was expecting this exactly, sorry if it was not clear.
( by the way, I am more interested on the second patch I just sent )
Thanks !
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-21 23:08 [net-next 00/13][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 01/13] ixgbe: Drop probe_vf and merge functionality into ixgbe_enable_sriov Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 02/13] ixgbe: Change how we check for pre-existing and assigned VFs Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 03/13] ixgbevf: Add lock around mailbox ops to prevent simultaneous access Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 04/13] ixgbevf: Add support for PCI error handling Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 05/13] ixgbe: Fix handling of FDIR_HASH flag Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 06/13] ixgbevf: Fix namespace issue with ixgbe_write_eitr Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 07/13] ixgbe: Reduce Rx header size to what is actually used Jeff Kirsher
2012-08-02 15:15 ` [PATCH] igb: reduce Rx header size Eric Dumazet
2012-08-02 15:43 ` Alexander Duyck
2012-08-02 15:52 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-08-02 20:28 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 08/13] ixgbe: Use num_tcs.pg_tcs as upper limit for TC when checking based on UP Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 09/13] ixgbe: fix RAR entry counting for generic and fdb_add() Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:08 ` [net-next 10/13] ixgbe: remove extra unused queues in DCB + FCoE case Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:09 ` [net-next 11/13] ixgbe: add support for new 82599 device Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:09 ` [net-next 12/13] ixgbe: Use 1TC DCB instead of disabling DCB for MSI and legacy interrupts Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-21 23:09 ` [net-next 13/13] igb: reset PHY in the link_up process to recover PHY setting after power down Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-22 19:24 ` [net-next 00/13][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates David Miller
2012-07-22 19:37 ` David Miller
2012-07-22 21:39 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-07-22 21:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343922767.9299.234.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=carolyn.wyborny@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox