* Re: TCP Delayed ACK in FIN/ACK [not found] <CACS4u_zUF9T0rSsndhyVzgaauOBFJ4LTUeb432B1zg_oLHvTsg@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-08-04 14:51 ` richard -rw- weinberger 2012-08-04 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: richard -rw- weinberger @ 2012-08-04 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sławek Janecki; +Cc: linux-kernel, netdev On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Sławek Janecki <janecki@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a node.js client (10.177.62.7) requesting some data from http > rest service from server (10.177.0.1). > Client is simply using nodejs http.request() method (agent=false). > Client is on Ubuntu 11.10 box. > Why client sends FIN ACK after 475ms? Why so slow? He should send FIN > ACK immediately. > I have many situations like this. About 1% of whole traffic is request > with delayed FIN ACK. > Cpu idle on the client is about 99%, so nothing is draining CPU. > How to debug this? What could it be? Is there any sysctl option I need to tune? > I think this behaviour is the Delayed ACK feature of RFC1122 TCP stack. > > Link to tcpdump picture (done on a client machine) : > http://i48.tinypic.com/35cpogx.png > > Can you tell why kernel delayed that FIN/ACK. > In tcpflow data there is exacly one ACK per packet comming from server. > Why kernel delayed client FIN/ACK. > It could avoid sending ACK every 'data' packet. > But it choose to delay FIN/ACK? > Is this possible? Is this a bug? > > I've also posted question on stackexchange: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11711218/client-sends-delayed-fin-ack-500ms-to-server > > Please help. CC'ing netdev. -- Thanks, //richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: TCP Delayed ACK in FIN/ACK 2012-08-04 14:51 ` TCP Delayed ACK in FIN/ACK richard -rw- weinberger @ 2012-08-04 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet 2012-08-04 19:20 ` Sławek Janecki 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Eric Dumazet @ 2012-08-04 16:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: richard -rw- weinberger; +Cc: Sławek Janecki, linux-kernel, netdev On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 16:51 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Sławek Janecki <janecki@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a node.js client (10.177.62.7) requesting some data from http > > rest service from server (10.177.0.1). > > Client is simply using nodejs http.request() method (agent=false). > > Client is on Ubuntu 11.10 box. > > Why client sends FIN ACK after 475ms? Why so slow? He should send FIN > > ACK immediately. > > I have many situations like this. About 1% of whole traffic is request > > with delayed FIN ACK. > > Cpu idle on the client is about 99%, so nothing is draining CPU. > > How to debug this? What could it be? Is there any sysctl option I need to tune? > > I think this behaviour is the Delayed ACK feature of RFC1122 TCP stack. > > > > Link to tcpdump picture (done on a client machine) : > > http://i48.tinypic.com/35cpogx.png > > > > Can you tell why kernel delayed that FIN/ACK. > > In tcpflow data there is exacly one ACK per packet comming from server. > > Why kernel delayed client FIN/ACK. > > It could avoid sending ACK every 'data' packet. > > But it choose to delay FIN/ACK? > > Is this possible? Is this a bug? > > > > I've also posted question on stackexchange: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11711218/client-sends-delayed-fin-ack-500ms-to-server > > > > Please help. > > CC'ing netdev. > I see nothing wrong in this tcpdump. You should strace the application instead. FIN/ACK is sent when client closes its socket (or calls shutdown()), and not in reply of FIN sent by the server. Kernel has no additional delay. I suspect your client is slow processing the server answer, then close() its socket _after_ data processing. Its possible tcp_send_fin() has to loop while allocating one skb under very high memory pressure, and it seems we have no counters for this case. But if it _was_ ever happening, you would have lot of messages in kernel log (dmesg) about alloc_skb_clone() failures. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: TCP Delayed ACK in FIN/ACK 2012-08-04 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet @ 2012-08-04 19:20 ` Sławek Janecki 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Sławek Janecki @ 2012-08-04 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Dumazet; +Cc: richard -rw- weinberger, linux-kernel, netdev I have no such info in dmsg. I think I will file a issue to Node.js Dev Team. Thanks for reply. On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 16:51 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Sławek Janecki <janecki@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I have a node.js client (10.177.62.7) requesting some data from http >> > rest service from server (10.177.0.1). >> > Client is simply using nodejs http.request() method (agent=false). >> > Client is on Ubuntu 11.10 box. >> > Why client sends FIN ACK after 475ms? Why so slow? He should send FIN >> > ACK immediately. >> > I have many situations like this. About 1% of whole traffic is request >> > with delayed FIN ACK. >> > Cpu idle on the client is about 99%, so nothing is draining CPU. >> > How to debug this? What could it be? Is there any sysctl option I need to tune? >> > I think this behaviour is the Delayed ACK feature of RFC1122 TCP stack. >> > >> > Link to tcpdump picture (done on a client machine) : >> > http://i48.tinypic.com/35cpogx.png >> > >> > Can you tell why kernel delayed that FIN/ACK. >> > In tcpflow data there is exacly one ACK per packet comming from server. >> > Why kernel delayed client FIN/ACK. >> > It could avoid sending ACK every 'data' packet. >> > But it choose to delay FIN/ACK? >> > Is this possible? Is this a bug? >> > >> > I've also posted question on stackexchange: >> > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11711218/client-sends-delayed-fin-ack-500ms-to-server >> > >> > Please help. >> >> CC'ing netdev. >> > > I see nothing wrong in this tcpdump. You should strace the application > instead. > > FIN/ACK is sent when client closes its socket (or calls shutdown()), and > not in reply of FIN sent by the server. > > Kernel has no additional delay. I suspect your client is slow processing > the server answer, then close() its socket _after_ data processing. > > Its possible tcp_send_fin() has to loop while allocating one skb under > very high memory pressure, and it seems we have no counters for this > case. But if it _was_ ever happening, you would have lot of messages in > kernel log (dmesg) about alloc_skb_clone() failures. > > > -- pozdrawiam Sławomir Janecki ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-04 19:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CACS4u_zUF9T0rSsndhyVzgaauOBFJ4LTUeb432B1zg_oLHvTsg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-08-04 14:51 ` TCP Delayed ACK in FIN/ACK richard -rw- weinberger
2012-08-04 16:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-04 19:20 ` Sławek Janecki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox