* [PATCH] af_unix: fix unix_nr_socks check in unix_create1()
@ 2012-08-25 6:05 Xi Wang
2012-08-25 6:43 ` Eric Dumazet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xi Wang @ 2012-08-25 6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: David S. Miller, Xi Wang, Eric Dumazet
This patch complements 518de9b3 ("fs: allow for more than 2^31 files").
get_max_files() returns files_stat.max_files, which can be set to any
value from user space via /proc/sys/fs/file-max. A large file-max will
cause an integer overflow in the following check:
if (atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files())
goto out;
The kernel will then fail to create a unix domain socket.
Rewrite the check using "/ 2" on the left-hand side.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index c5ee4ff..99a8bc9 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -630,9 +630,9 @@ static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock)
{
struct sock *sk = NULL;
struct unix_sock *u;
+ unsigned long nr_socks = atomic_long_inc_return(&unix_nr_socks);
- atomic_long_inc(&unix_nr_socks);
- if (atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files())
+ if (nr_socks / 2 > get_max_files())
goto out;
sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_UNIX, GFP_KERNEL, &unix_proto);
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] af_unix: fix unix_nr_socks check in unix_create1()
2012-08-25 6:05 [PATCH] af_unix: fix unix_nr_socks check in unix_create1() Xi Wang
@ 2012-08-25 6:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-25 16:17 ` Xi Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2012-08-25 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xi Wang; +Cc: netdev, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet
On Sat, 2012-08-25 at 02:05 -0400, Xi Wang wrote:
> This patch complements 518de9b3 ("fs: allow for more than 2^31 files").
>
> get_max_files() returns files_stat.max_files, which can be set to any
> value from user space via /proc/sys/fs/file-max. A large file-max will
> cause an integer overflow in the following check:
>
> if (atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files())
> goto out;
>
> The kernel will then fail to create a unix domain socket.
>
> Rewrite the check using "/ 2" on the left-hand side.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> ---
> net/unix/af_unix.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> index c5ee4ff..99a8bc9 100644
> --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> @@ -630,9 +630,9 @@ static struct sock *unix_create1(struct net *net, struct socket *sock)
> {
> struct sock *sk = NULL;
> struct unix_sock *u;
> + unsigned long nr_socks = atomic_long_inc_return(&unix_nr_socks);
>
> - atomic_long_inc(&unix_nr_socks);
> - if (atomic_long_read(&unix_nr_socks) > 2 * get_max_files())
> + if (nr_socks / 2 > get_max_files())
> goto out;
>
> sk = sk_alloc(net, PF_UNIX, GFP_KERNEL, &unix_proto);
I dont think this patch is right.
atomic_long_inc_return() is expensive, more than atomic_long_inc()
And setting a 2^63 limit for max number of files is plain wrong,
as there is no way a kernel can allocate 2^63 files structures.
(same apply on 32bit arches, but for 2^31)
If you feel you must warn a sysadmin of stupid settings, add sane
boundaries in kernel/sysctl.c, and send your patch to lkml instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] af_unix: fix unix_nr_socks check in unix_create1()
2012-08-25 6:43 ` Eric Dumazet
@ 2012-08-25 16:17 ` Xi Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xi Wang @ 2012-08-25 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet; +Cc: netdev, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet
On Aug 25, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> I dont think this patch is right.
>
> atomic_long_inc_return() is expensive, more than atomic_long_inc()
>
> And setting a 2^63 limit for max number of files is plain wrong,
> as there is no way a kernel can allocate 2^63 files structures.
>
> (same apply on 32bit arches, but for 2^31)
>
> If you feel you must warn a sysadmin of stupid settings, add sane
> boundaries in kernel/sysctl.c, and send your patch to lkml instead.
Yeah, I agree it's better to limit max_files in sysctl. I will send
another patch instead. Thanks.
- xi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-25 16:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-25 6:05 [PATCH] af_unix: fix unix_nr_socks check in unix_create1() Xi Wang
2012-08-25 6:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-25 16:17 ` Xi Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox