Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
	Vijay Subramanian <subramanian.vijay@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	saku@ytti.fi, rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP and reordering
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 18:40:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1354416005.20109.557.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354411840.21562.373.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>

On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 01:30 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:

> Oh, of *course*... this is why my kernel would panic if I attempted to
> add BQL to BR2684. The ATM low-level driver was pushing a header onto
> the skb, and I ended up calling netdev_completed_queue() with a larger
> 'bytes' value than the one I'd called netdev_sent_queue() with. Which
> leads to a BUG(), which immediately results in a panic. A moderately
> suboptimal failure mode, when a nasty warning and disabling BQL on this
> interface might have been nicer.
> 
> However, *perhaps* it isn't so hard to get a consistent 'bytes' value.
> This version appears to work... can we use something along these lines
> in the general case? What if skb_is_nonlinear()?
> 
> This probably doesn't work for L2TP where it's going to be passed down
> the whole stack and get a new network header and everything. But for
> BR2684 is this at least a salvageable approach?
> 
> --- net/atm/br2684.c~	2012-12-01 16:35:49.000000000 +0000
> +++ net/atm/br2684.c	2012-12-02 01:18:35.216607088 +0000
> @@ -180,6 +180,11 @@ static struct notifier_block atm_dev_not
>  	.notifier_call = atm_dev_event,
>  };
>  
> +static unsigned int skb_acct_len(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return skb_tail_pointer(skb) - skb_network_header(skb);
> +}
> +
>  /* chained vcc->pop function.  Check if we should wake the netif_queue */
>  static void br2684_pop(struct atm_vcc *vcc, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
> @@ -191,6 +196,8 @@ static void br2684_pop(struct atm_vcc *v
>  	/* If the queue space just went up from zero, wake */
>  	if (atomic_inc_return(&brvcc->qspace) == 1)
>  		netif_wake_queue(brvcc->device);
> +
> +	netdev_completed_queue(brvcc->device, 1, skb_acct_len(skb));
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -265,6 +272,7 @@ static int br2684_xmit_vcc(struct sk_buf
>  			netif_wake_queue(brvcc->device);
>  	}
>  
> +	netdev_sent_queue(brvcc->device, skb_acct_len(skb));
>  	/* If this fails immediately, the skb will be freed and br2684_pop()
>  	   will wake the queue if appropriate. Just return an error so that
>  	   the stats are updated correctly */
> @@ -710,6 +718,7 @@ static int br2684_create(void __user *ar
>  		return err;
>  	}


Apparently this driver doesnt add any feature at alloc_netdev() time, so
it might work. (no frags in any skb)

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-02  2:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27  9:32 TCP and reordering Saku Ytti
2012-11-27 17:05 ` Rick Jones
2012-11-27 17:15   ` Saku Ytti
2012-11-27 18:00     ` Rick Jones
2012-11-28  2:06     ` David Miller
2012-11-28  7:26       ` Saku Ytti
2012-11-28  8:35         ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-11-28  8:54           ` Saku Ytti
2012-11-28 18:24             ` Rick Jones
2012-11-28 18:33               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 18:52                 ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-11-28 18:44               ` Saku Ytti
2012-11-28  7:59       ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28  8:21         ` Christoph Paasch
2012-11-28  8:22         ` Vijay Subramanian
2012-11-28  9:08           ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28 11:02             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 11:49               ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28 12:26                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 12:39                   ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28 12:52                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 15:47                       ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28 16:09                         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 16:21                           ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28 16:19                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-11-28 16:41                           ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-28 17:08                             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2012-11-28 17:16                             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-11-28 18:01                               ` David Woodhouse
2012-11-29 15:10                                 ` Noel Grandin
2012-12-02  1:30                               ` David Woodhouse
2012-12-02  2:40                                 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2012-12-02  9:31                                   ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1354416005.20109.557.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=saku@ytti.fi \
    --cc=subramanian.vijay@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox