From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/3] unix/dgram: peek beyond 0-sized skbs
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:48:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366915736.8964.171.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366897638-21882-1-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de>
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 09:47 -0400, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> "77c1090 net: fix infinite loop in __skb_recv_datagram()" (v3.8) introduced a
> regression:
> After that commit, recv can no longer peek beyond a 0-sized skb in the queue.
> __skb_recv_datagram() instead stops at the first skb with len == 0 and results
> in the system call failing with -EFAULT via skb_copy_datagram_iovec().
if MSG_PEEK is not used, what happens here ?
It doesn't look right to me that we return -EFAULT if skb->len is 0,
EFAULT is reserved to faulting (ie reading/writing at least one byte)
How are we telling the user message had 0 byte, but its not EOF ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-25 13:47 [PATCH net 1/3] unix/dgram: peek beyond 0-sized skbs Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-25 13:47 ` [PATCH net 2/3] unix/dgram: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-25 18:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-25 13:47 ` [PATCH net 3/3] unix/stream: " Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-25 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-04-26 18:35 ` [PATCH net 1/3] unix/dgram: peek beyond 0-sized skbs Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-26 18:35 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] unix/dgram: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-29 7:01 ` Cong Wang
2013-04-29 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] unix/dgram: peek beyond 0-sized skbs Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-29 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] unix/dgram: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-30 0:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-30 4:44 ` David Miller
2013-04-29 21:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] unix/stream: " Benjamin Poirier
2013-04-30 0:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-30 4:44 ` David Miller
2013-04-30 0:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] unix/dgram: peek beyond 0-sized skbs Eric Dumazet
2013-04-30 4:44 ` David Miller
2013-04-26 18:35 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue Benjamin Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366915736.8964.171.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=bpoirier@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox