public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/4] bridge: Handle priority-tagged frames properly
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:34:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1378809280.3988.8.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378808874.3988.2.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita>

IEEE 802.1Q says that when we receive priority-tagged (VID 0) frames
use the PVID for the port as its VID.
(See IEEE 802.1Q-2005 6.7.1 and Table 9-2)

Apply the PVID to not only untagged frames but also priority-tagged frames.

Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
 net/bridge/br_vlan.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
index 21b6d21..5a9c44a 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
@@ -189,6 +189,8 @@ out:
 bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
 			struct sk_buff *skb, u16 *vid)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	/* If VLAN filtering is disabled on the bridge, all packets are
 	 * permitted.
 	 */
@@ -201,20 +203,31 @@ bool br_allowed_ingress(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_port_vlans *v,
 	if (!v)
 		return false;
 
-	if (br_vlan_get_tag(skb, vid)) {
+	err = br_vlan_get_tag(skb, vid);
+	if (!*vid) {
 		u16 pvid = br_get_pvid(v);
 
-		/* Frame did not have a tag.  See if pvid is set
-		 * on this port.  That tells us which vlan untagged
-		 * traffic belongs to.
+		/* Frame had a tag with VID 0 or did not have a tag.
+		 * See if pvid is set on this port.  That tells us which
+		 * vlan untagged or priority-tagged traffic belongs to.
 		 */
 		if (pvid == VLAN_N_VID)
 			return false;
 
-		/* PVID is set on this port.  Any untagged ingress
-		 * frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
+		/* PVID is set on this port.  Any untagged or priority-tagged
+		 * ingress frame is considered to belong to this vlan.
 		 */
-		__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
+		if (likely(err))
+			/* Untagged Frame. */
+			__vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), pvid);
+		else
+			/* Priority-tagged Frame.
+			 * At this point, We know that skb->vlan_tci had
+			 * VLAN_TAG_PRESENT bit and its VID field was 0x000.
+			 * We update only VID field and preserve PCP field.
+			 */
+			skb->vlan_tci |= pvid;
+
 		return true;
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-10 10:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-10 10:27 [PATCH net 0/4] bridge: Fix problems around the PVID Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 10:32 ` [PATCH net 1/4] bridge: Don't use VID 0 and 4095 in vlan filtering Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:22   ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-12 19:55     ` David Miller
2013-09-12 20:57       ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-10 10:34 ` Toshiaki Makita [this message]
2013-09-10 14:03   ` [PATCH net 2/4] bridge: Handle priority-tagged frames properly Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-11  7:00     ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-11 16:32       ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-12  8:08         ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 10:37 ` [PATCH net 3/4] bridge: Fix the way the PVID is referenced Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:08   ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-10 14:24   ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-10 10:39 ` [PATCH net 4/4] bridge: Fix updating FDB entries when the PVID is applied Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-10 14:24   ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-12 20:00 ` [PATCH net 0/4] bridge: Fix problems around the PVID David Miller
2013-09-13 12:06   ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-13 15:21     ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-09-14 15:42       ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-16 17:49     ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-17  8:12       ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-23 14:41         ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-24 11:45           ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-24 13:35             ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-24 17:30               ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-24 17:55                 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-26 10:38                   ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-26 14:22                     ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-27 17:11                       ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-27 18:10                         ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-09-30 11:46                           ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-09-30 16:01                             ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-01 11:56                               ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-09 15:01                                 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-11  7:34                                   ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-11 14:14                                     ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-10-13 16:11                                       ` Toshiaki Makita
2013-10-15 13:55                                         ` Vlad Yasevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1378809280.3988.8.camel@ubuntu-vm-makita \
    --to=makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox