Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH ethtool] sfc: Remove preprocessor condition from register table definitions
@ 2013-11-07 19:58 Ben Hutchings
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ben Hutchings @ 2013-11-07 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

This condition was mistakenly copied from the corresponding
definitions in the out-of-tree version of sfc.  It has no effect here.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
---
I've applied this change just after the 3.12 tag.

Ben.

 sfc.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sfc.c b/sfc.c
index 1bb3689..9478b38 100644
--- a/sfc.c
+++ b/sfc.c
@@ -3739,9 +3739,7 @@ static const struct efx_nic_reg_table efx_nic_reg_tables[] = {
 	REGISTER_TABLE_CZ(MC_TREG_SMEM),
 	/* MSIX_PBA_TABLE is not mapped */
 	/* SRM_DBG is not mapped (and is redundant with BUF_FLL_TBL) */
-#if !defined(EFX_USE_KCOMPAT) || defined(EFX_HAVE_VMALLOC_REG_DUMP_BUF)
 	REGISTER_TABLE_BZ(RX_FILTER_TBL0),
-#endif
 	REGISTER_TABLE_DZ(BIU_MC_SFT_STATUS),
 };
 
-- 
1.8.1.4


-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-11-07 19:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-07 19:58 [PATCH ethtool] sfc: Remove preprocessor condition from register table definitions Ben Hutchings

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox