From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>,
dingtianhong@huawei.com, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Subject: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/3] bonding: fix __get_first_agg RCU usage
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:59:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1389351585-19615-3-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389351585-19615-1-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com>
Currently, the RCU read lock usage is just wrong - it gets the slave struct
under RCU and continues to use it when RCU lock is released.
However, it's still safe to do this cause we didn't need the
rcu_read_lock() initially - all of the __get_first_agg() callers are either
holding RCU read lock or the RTNL lock, so that we can't sync while in it.
Fixes: be79bd048 ("bonding: add RCU for bond_3ad_state_machine_handler()")
CC: dingtianhong@huawei.com
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
---
Notes:
v3 -> v4: add rcu_read_lock() to silence lockdep.
v2 -> v3:
Use the rcu primitives.
v1 -> v2:
Don't use RCU primitives as we can hold RTNL.
drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index da0d7c5..b49f421 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -143,11 +143,13 @@ static inline struct bonding *__get_bond_by_port(struct port *port)
*
* Return the aggregator of the first slave in @bond, or %NULL if it can't be
* found.
+ * The caller must hold RCU or RTNL lock.
*/
static inline struct aggregator *__get_first_agg(struct port *port)
{
struct bonding *bond = __get_bond_by_port(port);
struct slave *first_slave;
+ struct aggregator *agg;
/* If there's no bond for this port, or bond has no slaves */
if (bond == NULL)
@@ -155,9 +157,10 @@ static inline struct aggregator *__get_first_agg(struct port *port)
rcu_read_lock();
first_slave = bond_first_slave_rcu(bond);
+ agg = first_slave ? &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(first_slave).aggregator) : NULL;
rcu_read_unlock();
- return first_slave ? &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(first_slave).aggregator) : NULL;
+ return agg;
}
/**
--
1.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 10:59 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/3] bonding: fix bond_3ad RCU usage Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-10 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/3] bonding: fix bond_3ad_set_carrier() " Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-10 10:59 ` Veaceslav Falico [this message]
2014-01-10 10:59 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/3] bonding: fix __get_active_agg() RCU logic Veaceslav Falico
2014-01-14 6:22 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 0/3] bonding: fix bond_3ad RCU usage David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1389351585-19615-3-git-send-email-vfalico@redhat.com \
--to=vfalico@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox