From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/3] bnxt_en: Fix bnxt_reset() in the slow path task.
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 02:55:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1485330909-12037-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485330909-12037-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
In bnxt_sp_task(), we set a bit BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK so that bnxt_close()
will synchronize and wait for bnxt_sp_task() to finish. Some functions
in bnxt_sp_task() require us to clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK and then
acquire rtnl_lock() to prevent race conditions.
There are some bugs related to this logic. This patch refactors the code
to have common bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp() and bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp() to handle
the RTNL and the clearing/setting of the bit. Multiple functions will
need the same logic. We also need to move bnxt_reset() to the end of
bnxt_sp_task(). Functions that clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK must be the
last functions to be called in bnxt_sp_task(). The common scheme will
handle the condition properly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 53e686f..30d7d64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -6200,23 +6200,32 @@ static void bnxt_timer(unsigned long data)
mod_timer(&bp->timer, jiffies + bp->current_interval);
}
-/* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
-static void bnxt_reset(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent)
+static void bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
{
- /* bnxt_reset_task() calls bnxt_close_nic() which waits
- * for BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK to clear.
- * If there is a parallel dev_close(), bnxt_close() may be holding
+ /* We are called from bnxt_sp_task which has BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK
+ * set. If the device is being closed, bnxt_close() may be holding
* rtnl() and waiting for BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK to clear. So we
* must clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK before holding rtnl().
*/
clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
rtnl_lock();
- if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state))
- bnxt_reset_task(bp, silent);
+}
+
+static void bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(struct bnxt *bp)
+{
set_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
rtnl_unlock();
}
+/* Only called from bnxt_sp_task() */
+static void bnxt_reset(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent)
+{
+ bnxt_rtnl_lock_sp(bp);
+ if (test_bit(BNXT_STATE_OPEN, &bp->state))
+ bnxt_reset_task(bp, silent);
+ bnxt_rtnl_unlock_sp(bp);
+}
+
static void bnxt_cfg_ntp_filters(struct bnxt *);
static void bnxt_sp_task(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -6266,18 +6275,21 @@ static void bnxt_sp_task(struct work_struct *work)
bnxt_hwrm_tunnel_dst_port_free(
bp, TUNNEL_DST_PORT_FREE_REQ_TUNNEL_TYPE_GENEVE);
}
- if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
- bnxt_reset(bp, false);
-
- if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SILENT_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
- bnxt_reset(bp, true);
-
if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_HWRM_PORT_MODULE_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
bnxt_get_port_module_status(bp);
if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_PERIODIC_STATS_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
bnxt_hwrm_port_qstats(bp);
+ /* These functions below will clear BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK. They
+ * must be the last functions to be called before exiting.
+ */
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
+ bnxt_reset(bp, false);
+
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RESET_TASK_SILENT_SP_EVENT, &bp->sp_event))
+ bnxt_reset(bp, true);
+
smp_mb__before_atomic();
clear_bit(BNXT_STATE_IN_SP_TASK, &bp->state);
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-25 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-25 7:55 [PATCH net 0/3] bnxt_en: Fix RTNL lock usage in bnxt_sp_task() Michael Chan
2017-01-25 7:55 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2017-01-25 7:55 ` [PATCH net 2/3] bnxt_en: Fix RTNL lock usage on bnxt_update_link() Michael Chan
2017-01-25 7:55 ` [PATCH net 3/3] bnxt_en: Fix RTNL lock usage on bnxt_get_port_module_status() Michael Chan
2017-01-25 18:27 ` [PATCH net 0/3] bnxt_en: Fix RTNL lock usage in bnxt_sp_task() David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1485330909-12037-2-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--to=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox