From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: liujian <liujian56@huawei.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, edumazet@google.com, ycheng@google.com,
hkchu@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, weiyongjun1@huawei.com,
wangkefeng 00227729 <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer()
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:40:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1505313647.15310.165.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c750ac3-8739-89ed-ce41-d4cde755171e@huawei.com>
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 15:15 +0800, liujian wrote:
>
> 在 2017/9/13 14:56, liujian 写道:
> >
> >
> > 在 2017/9/12 23:38, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> >> On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 08:05 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 14:08 +0800, liujian wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> In the scenario, tcp server side IP changed, and at that memont,
> >>>> userspace application still send data continuously;
> >>>> tcp_send_head(sk)'s timestamp always be refreshed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here is the packetdrill script:
> >>>>
> >>>> 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> >>>> +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> >>>> +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
> >>>> +0 listen(3, 1) = 0
> >>>>
> >>>> +0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
> >>>> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7>
> >>>>
> >>>> +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65530
> >>>> +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
> >>>>
> >>>> +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
> >>>> +0 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +0 > P. 1:25(24) ack 1 win 229
> >>>> +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 25 win 65530
> >>>>
> >>>> //change the ipaddress
> >>>> +1 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.10/16`
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>> +3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
> >>>>
> >>>> +0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.1/16`
> >>>> +0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
> >>>> +0 write(4, ..., 24) = -1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> This has nothing to do with the code patch you have changed.
> >>>
> >>> How have you tested your patch exactly ?
> >>>
> > I tested the patch, it can work.
> >
> > [root@localhost ~]# time ./gtests/net/packetdrill/packetdrill test.pkt
> > test.pkt:24: runtime error in write call: Expected result 24 but got -1 with errno 110 (Connection timed out)
> >
> > real 0m5.356s
> > user 0m0.026s
> > sys 0m0.104s
> >
> > [root@localhost ~]# ss -toenmi src :8080
> > State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
> > ESTAB 0 48 192.168.0.1:8080 192.0.2.1:39559 timer:(persist,186ms,2) ino:37178 sk:6 <->
> > skmem:(r0,rb369280,t0,tb87040,f1792,w2304,o0,bl0) sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:301 backoff:2 rtt:100.253/37.643 mss:1460 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:24 segs_out:5 segs_in:3 send 1.2Mbps lastsnd:976 lastrcv:4082 lastack:3982 pacing_rate 2.3Mbps rcv_space:29200
> >
> >
> > if change the TCP_USER_TIMEOUT to 30s, test result as below:
> >
> > [root@localhost ~]# time ./gtests/net/packetdrill/packetdrill test.pkt
> > test.pkt:37: runtime error in write call: Expected result 24 but got -1 with errno 110 (Connection timed out)
> >
> > real 0m44.362s
> > user 0m0.018s
> > sys 0m0.110s
> >
> > ESTAB 0 360 192.168.0.1:8080 192.0.2.1:47577 timer:(persist,516ms,6) ino:18806 sk:5 <->
> > skmem:(r0,rb369280,t0,tb87040,f1792,w2304,o0,bl0) sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:301 backoff:6 rtt:100.228/37.623 mss:10 bytes_acked:24 segs_out:22 segs_in:3 send 1.2Mbps lastsnd:2343 lastrcv:40450 lastack:40350 pacing_rate 2.3Mbps rcv_sp
> >
> >>
> >> lpaa23:~# ss -toenmi src :8080
> >> State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer
> >> Address:Port
> >> ESTAB 0 144 192.168.134.161:8080
> >> 192.0.2.1:51165 timer:(persist,8.262ms,5) ino:1
> >> 82083 sk:3 <->
> >> skmem:(r0,rb359040,t0,tb46080,f1792,w2304,o0,bl0,d0) sack cubic
> >> wscale:7,8 rto:301 backoff:5 rtt:100.127/37.576
> >> mss:1460 rcvmss:536 advmss:1460 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:24 segs_out:12
> >> segs_in:3 data_segs_out:12 send 1.2Mbps lastsnd:1370 l
> >> astrcv:13348 lastack:13248 pacing_rate 2.3Mbps delivery_rate 116.7Kbps
> >> app_limited busy:11346ms rcv_space:29200 notsent:1
> >> 44 minrtt:100.043userspace application still send data continuously
> >>
> >> This is the typical RTO timer, not zero window probe.
> >>
> > with the script, it is not zero window; but the code enter tcp_probe_timer.
> > ->tcp_sendmsg
> > -->tcp_push
> > ---->__tcp_push_pending_frames
> > ------>tcp_write_xmit
> > -------->tcp_transmit_skb (at this function, tcp_send_head(sk)'s timestamp was be refreshed)
> > ---------->ip_queue_xmit (can not find route, return -EHOSTUNREACH)
> > -------->tcp_transmit_skb (send fail, do not advance send head)
> > ------->tcp_check_probe_timer (reset ICSK_TIME_PROBE0 timer)
> sorry, change to
> ->tcp_sendmsg
> -->tcp_push
> ---->__tcp_push_pending_frames
> ------>tcp_write_xmit
> -------->tcp_transmit_skb (at this function, tcp_send_head(sk)'s timestamp was be refreshed)
> ---------->ip_queue_xmit (can not find route, return -EHOSTUNREACH)
> ------>tcp_write_xmit (send fail, do not advance send head)
> ------>tcp_check_probe_timer (reset ICSK_TIME_PROBE0 timer)
OK but :
1) keepalive_time_elapsed() returns jiffies, and you compare it to a ms
value. It will break on kernels with HZ=100
2) keepalive_time_elapsed() is reset every time a packet is received.
With following packetdrill your patch (even if we fix 1)) breaks again
# ./packetdrill --local_ip 192.168.102.64 user_timeout.pkt
# cat user_timeout.pkt
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
+0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.102.64/16; ip ro add 192.0.2.1 dev tun0`
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8>
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65530
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
+0 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 > P. 1:25(24) ack 1 win 115
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 25 win 65530
//change the ipaddress
+1 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.10/16`
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.102.64/16`
+0 < . 1:2(1) ack 25 win 65530
+0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.10/16`
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.1/16`
+0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
+0 write(4, ..., 24) = -1
I would instead try to keep a meaningful value in
tcp_send_head(sk)->skb_mstamp if the transmit failed.
Or more exactly change skb->skb_mstamp only on (successfully)
transmitted skb.
I will provide a patch ( fixing net/ipv4/tcp_output.c )
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 6:27 [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer() liujian56
2017-09-11 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-11 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-11 15:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-12 6:08 ` liujian
2017-09-12 15:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-12 15:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-13 6:56 ` liujian
2017-09-13 7:15 ` liujian
2017-09-13 14:40 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2017-09-14 3:30 ` [PATCH net] tcp: update skb->skb_mstamp more carefully Eric Dumazet
2017-09-14 8:17 ` liujian
2017-09-14 13:57 ` Neal Cardwell
2017-09-14 16:32 ` Yuchung Cheng
2017-09-14 16:41 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-09-15 21:37 ` David Miller
2017-09-15 23:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-15 23:47 ` [PATCH net] tcp: fix data delivery rate Eric Dumazet
2017-09-16 1:33 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-09-16 16:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1505313647.15310.165.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkchu@google.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=liujian56@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox