From: liujian <liujian56@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
<yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<ycheng@google.com>, <hkchu@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
wangkefeng 00227729 <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer()
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:08:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7e09201-40c2-933a-1e8e-a31eddcc75ab@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1505143348.15310.118.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Hi,
In the scenario, tcp server side IP changed, and at that memont,
userspace application still send data continuously;
tcp_send_head(sk)'s timestamp always be refreshed.
Here is the packetdrill script:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7>
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65530
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
+0 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 > P. 1:25(24) ack 1 win 229
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 25 win 65530
//change the ipaddress
+1 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.10/16`
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+1 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+3 write(4, ..., 24) = 24
+0 `ifconfig tun0 192.168.0.1/16`
+0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
+0 write(4, ..., 24) = -1
[root@localhost ~]# time ./gtests/net/packetdrill/packetdrill test.pkt
test.pkt:50: runtime error in write call: Expected result -1 but got 24 with errno 2 (No such file or directory)
real 1m11.364s
user 0m0.028s
sys 0m0.106s
[root@localhost ~]# netstat -toen
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State User Inode Timer
tcp 0 504 192.168.0.1:8080 192.0.2.1:33993 ESTABLISHED 0 45453 probe (22.38/0/7)
since the script didn't wait for enough time, here only got 7 probes.
在 2017/9/11 23:22, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 08:13 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> You can see we got only 3 probes, not 4.
>
> Here is complete packetdrill test showing that code behaves as expected.
>
> 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> +0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> +0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
> +0 listen(3, 1) = 0
>
> +0 < S 0:0(0) win 0 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
> +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 8>
>
> // Client advertises a zero receive window, so we can't send.
> +.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 0
> +0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
>
> +0 setsockopt(4, SOL_TCP, TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, [3000], 4) = 0
> +0 write(4, ..., 2920) = 2920
>
> // Window probes are scheduled just like RTOs.
> +.3~+.31 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> +.6~+.62 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
> +1.2~+1.24 > . 0:0(0) ack 1
>
> // Peer opens its window too late !
> +3 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1000
> +0 > R 1:1(0)
>
>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-12 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-11 6:27 [PATCH] tcp: TCP_USER_TIMEOUT can not work in tcp_probe_timer() liujian56
2017-09-11 14:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-11 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-11 15:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-12 6:08 ` liujian [this message]
2017-09-12 15:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-12 15:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-13 6:56 ` liujian
2017-09-13 7:15 ` liujian
2017-09-13 14:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-14 3:30 ` [PATCH net] tcp: update skb->skb_mstamp more carefully Eric Dumazet
2017-09-14 8:17 ` liujian
2017-09-14 13:57 ` Neal Cardwell
2017-09-14 16:32 ` Yuchung Cheng
2017-09-14 16:41 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-09-15 21:37 ` David Miller
2017-09-15 23:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2017-09-15 23:47 ` [PATCH net] tcp: fix data delivery rate Eric Dumazet
2017-09-16 1:33 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-09-16 16:07 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e7e09201-40c2-933a-1e8e-a31eddcc75ab@huawei.com \
--to=liujian56@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hkchu@google.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox