From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
edumazet@google.com, yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, yotamg@mellanox.com,
soheil@google.com, avagin@virtuozzo.com,
nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, fw@strlen.de,
roman.kapl@sysgo.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com,
andreyknvl@google.com, lkp@intel.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: Revert "ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control"
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:14:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152145089432.7718.3981942805167545803.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152145065475.7718.16297762717744383072.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
This reverts commit 1215e51edad1.
Since raw_close() is used on every RAW socket destruction,
the changes made by 1215e51edad1 scale sadly. This clearly
seen on endless unshare(CLONE_NEWNET) test, and cleanup_net()
kwork spends a lot of time waiting for rtnl_lock() introduced
by this commit.
Next patches in series will rework this in another way,
so now we revert 1215e51edad1. Also, it doesn't seen
mrtsock_destruct() takes sk_lock, and the comment to the commit
does not show the actual stack dump. So, there is a question
did we really need in it.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 1 -
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 11 +++++++++--
net/ipv4/raw.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index be7c3b71914d..b7bac7351409 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -594,7 +594,6 @@ static bool setsockopt_needs_rtnl(int optname)
case MCAST_LEAVE_GROUP:
case MCAST_LEAVE_SOURCE_GROUP:
case MCAST_UNBLOCK_SOURCE:
- case IP_ROUTER_ALERT:
return true;
}
return false;
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index d752a70855d8..f6be5db16da2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -1399,7 +1399,7 @@ static void mrtsock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
struct mr_table *mrt;
- ASSERT_RTNL();
+ rtnl_lock();
ipmr_for_each_table(mrt, net) {
if (sk == rtnl_dereference(mrt->mroute_sk)) {
IPV4_DEVCONF_ALL(net, MC_FORWARDING)--;
@@ -1411,6 +1411,7 @@ static void mrtsock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
mroute_clean_tables(mrt, false);
}
}
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
/* Socket options and virtual interface manipulation. The whole
@@ -1475,8 +1476,13 @@ int ip_mroute_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, char __user *optval,
if (sk != rcu_access_pointer(mrt->mroute_sk)) {
ret = -EACCES;
} else {
+ /* We need to unlock here because mrtsock_destruct takes
+ * care of rtnl itself and we can't change that due to
+ * the IP_ROUTER_ALERT setsockopt which runs without it.
+ */
+ rtnl_unlock();
ret = ip_ra_control(sk, 0, NULL);
- goto out_unlock;
+ goto out;
}
break;
case MRT_ADD_VIF:
@@ -1588,6 +1594,7 @@ int ip_mroute_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname, char __user *optval,
}
out_unlock:
rtnl_unlock();
+out:
return ret;
}
diff --git a/net/ipv4/raw.c b/net/ipv4/raw.c
index 54648d20bf0f..720bef7da2f6 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/raw.c
@@ -711,9 +711,7 @@ static void raw_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
/*
* Raw sockets may have direct kernel references. Kill them.
*/
- rtnl_lock();
ip_ra_control(sk, 0, NULL);
- rtnl_unlock();
sk_common_release(sk);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 9:14 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] Rework ip_ra_chain protection Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: Revert "ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock" Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:14 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2018-03-20 16:23 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: Revert "ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control" David Miller
2018-03-20 19:25 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-20 21:50 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-22 18:41 ` David Miller
2018-03-19 9:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: Move IP_ROUTER_ALERT out of lock_sock(sk) Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: Make ip_ra_chain per struct net Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: Replace ip_ra_lock with per-net mutex Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152145089432.7718.3981942805167545803.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roman.kapl@sysgo.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=yotamg@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox