From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org,
edumazet@google.com, yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, yotamg@mellanox.com,
soheil@google.com, avagin@virtuozzo.com,
nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, fw@strlen.de,
roman.kapl@sysgo.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, dvyukov@google.com,
andreyknvl@google.com, lkp@intel.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: Replace ip_ra_lock with per-net mutex
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:15:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152145092288.7718.16666188698174487102.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152145065475.7718.16297762717744383072.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Since ra_chain is per-net, we may use per-net mutexes
to protect them in ip_ra_control(). This improves
scalability.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
---
include/net/netns/ipv4.h | 1 +
net/core/net_namespace.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c | 15 ++++++---------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
index 97d7ee6667c7..8491bc9c86b1 100644
--- a/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/ipv4.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ struct netns_ipv4 {
struct ipv4_devconf *devconf_all;
struct ipv4_devconf *devconf_dflt;
struct ip_ra_chain __rcu *ra_chain;
+ struct mutex ra_mutex;
#ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTIPLE_TABLES
struct fib_rules_ops *rules_ops;
bool fib_has_custom_rules;
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index c340d5cfbdec..95ba2c53bd9a 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ static __net_init int setup_net(struct net *net, struct user_namespace *user_ns)
net->user_ns = user_ns;
idr_init(&net->netns_ids);
spin_lock_init(&net->nsid_lock);
+ mutex_init(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(ops, &pernet_list, list) {
error = ops_init(ops, net);
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
index f36d35fe924b..5ad2d8ed3a3f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c
@@ -322,9 +322,6 @@ int ip_cmsg_send(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, struct ipcm_cookie *ipc,
return 0;
}
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip_ra_lock);
-
-
static void ip_ra_destroy_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct ip_ra_chain *ra = container_of(head, struct ip_ra_chain, rcu);
@@ -345,21 +342,21 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
new_ra = on ? kmalloc(sizeof(*new_ra), GFP_KERNEL) : NULL;
- spin_lock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
for (rap = &net->ipv4.ra_chain;
(ra = rcu_dereference_protected(*rap,
- lockdep_is_held(&ip_ra_lock))) != NULL;
+ lockdep_is_held(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex))) != NULL;
rap = &ra->next) {
if (ra->sk == sk) {
if (on) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
kfree(new_ra);
return -EADDRINUSE;
}
/* dont let ip_call_ra_chain() use sk again */
ra->sk = NULL;
RCU_INIT_POINTER(*rap, ra->next);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
if (ra->destructor)
ra->destructor(sk);
@@ -374,7 +371,7 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
}
}
if (!new_ra) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
return -ENOBUFS;
}
new_ra->sk = sk;
@@ -383,7 +380,7 @@ int ip_ra_control(struct sock *sk, unsigned char on,
RCU_INIT_POINTER(new_ra->next, ra);
rcu_assign_pointer(*rap, new_ra);
sock_hold(sk);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_ra_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&net->ipv4.ra_mutex);
return 0;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-19 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 9:14 [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] Rework ip_ra_chain protection Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/5] net: Revert "ipv4: get rid of ip_ra_lock" Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: Revert "ipv4: fix a deadlock in ip_ra_control" Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-20 16:23 ` David Miller
2018-03-20 19:25 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-20 21:50 ` Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-22 18:41 ` David Miller
2018-03-19 9:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/5] net: Move IP_ROUTER_ALERT out of lock_sock(sk) Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:15 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/5] net: Make ip_ra_chain per struct net Kirill Tkhai
2018-03-19 9:15 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152145092288.7718.16666188698174487102.stgit@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=avagin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roman.kapl@sysgo.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=yotamg@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox