* [PATCH v2 net-next] ipvlan: use netif_receive_skb() in ipvlan_process_multicast()
@ 2026-05-12 4:20 Eric Dumazet
2026-05-14 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Eric Dumazet @ 2026-05-12 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S . Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, Andrew Lunn, netdev, eric.dumazet, Eric Dumazet
ipvlan_process_multicast() runs from process context, there is no
risk of stack overflow if we call netif_receive_skb() instead
of netif_rx().
This avoids some overhead adding/removing skbs to/from a per-cpu
backlog and raising/processing NET_RX softirqs.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
v2: Resend after realizing Sashiko's feedback was not actionable.
drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
index 1be8620ad3971d281fb36fd0770efd67b566ae60..7ad12dc7845c836bdd04395f153b2b4b397797d6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ void ipvlan_process_multicast(struct work_struct *work)
if (tx_pkt)
ret = dev_forward_skb(ipvlan->dev, nskb);
else
- ret = netif_rx(nskb);
+ ret = netif_receive_skb(nskb);
}
ipvlan_count_rx(ipvlan, len, ret == NET_RX_SUCCESS, true);
local_bh_enable();
--
2.54.0.563.g4f69b47b94-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ipvlan: use netif_receive_skb() in ipvlan_process_multicast()
2026-05-12 4:20 [PATCH v2 net-next] ipvlan: use netif_receive_skb() in ipvlan_process_multicast() Eric Dumazet
@ 2026-05-14 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2026-05-14 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Dumazet
Cc: davem, kuba, pabeni, horms, andrew+netdev, netdev, eric.dumazet
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 12 May 2026 04:20:19 +0000 you wrote:
> ipvlan_process_multicast() runs from process context, there is no
> risk of stack overflow if we call netif_receive_skb() instead
> of netif_rx().
>
> This avoids some overhead adding/removing skbs to/from a per-cpu
> backlog and raising/processing NET_RX softirqs.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,net-next] ipvlan: use netif_receive_skb() in ipvlan_process_multicast()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d0273dbe8be1
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-14 1:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-12 4:20 [PATCH v2 net-next] ipvlan: use netif_receive_skb() in ipvlan_process_multicast() Eric Dumazet
2026-05-14 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox