From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: shaper: follow ups to recent fixes
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 11:00:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178117561588.3897339.6842708895073002638.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609183224.1108521-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 11:32:20 -0700 you wrote:
> As discussed previously on the patch set with real fixes the xa_locking
> in shapers is a little confusing, remove it.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260506000628.1501691-2-kuba@kernel.org
>
> The remaining three patches are an attempt to silence AI reviewers,
> I believe Sashiko was complaining about these non-issues. Not adding
> Reported tags since these are false positives.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,1/4] net: shaper: drop redundant xa_lock() bracketing
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/f26cddcf2a8a
- [net-next,2/4] net: shaper: drop unnecessary kfree_rcu in pre_insert
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3500dfa6ff0e
- [net-next,3/4] net: shaper: add a comment why we don't need kfree_rcu() in flush
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3b4ba5726338
- [net-next,4/4] net: shaper: add a note that we expect cap dumps to be tiny
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/7421a813778b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 18:32 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: shaper: follow ups to recent fixes Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: shaper: drop redundant xa_lock() bracketing Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: shaper: drop unnecessary kfree_rcu in pre_insert Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: shaper: add a comment why we don't need kfree_rcu() in flush Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-09 18:32 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: shaper: add a note that we expect cap dumps to be tiny Jakub Kicinski
2026-06-11 11:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178117561588.3897339.6842708895073002638.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox