* [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-af: Validate NIX maximum LFs correctly
@ 2026-06-17 15:22 Subbaraya Sundeep
2026-06-17 15:31 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Subbaraya Sundeep @ 2026-06-17 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, sgoutham, gakula,
bbhushan2, rkannoth
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, Subbaraya Sundeep
NIX maximum number of LFs can be set via devlink command
but that can be done before assigning any LFs to a PF/VF.
The condition used to check whether any LFs are assigned is
incorrect. This patch fixes that condition.
Fixes: dd7842878633 ("octeontx2-af: Add new devlink param to configure maximum usable NIX block LFs")
Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>
---
.../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c | 27 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c
index 6494a9ee2f0d..3b47ecb44d51 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c
@@ -1510,7 +1510,9 @@ static int rvu_af_dl_nix_maxlf_validate(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
struct rvu_devlink *rvu_dl = devlink_priv(devlink);
struct rvu *rvu = rvu_dl->rvu;
u16 max_nix0_lf, max_nix1_lf;
- struct npc_mcam *mcam;
+ struct rvu_block *block;
+ int blkaddr = 0;
+ int free_lfs;
u64 cfg;
cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, BLKADDR_NIX0, NIX_AF_CONST2);
@@ -1518,14 +1520,23 @@ static int rvu_af_dl_nix_maxlf_validate(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, BLKADDR_NIX1, NIX_AF_CONST2);
max_nix1_lf = cfg & 0xFFF;
- /* Do not allow user to modify maximum NIX LFs while mcam entries
- * have already been assigned.
+ /* Do not allow user to modify maximum NIX LFs while NIX LFs
+ * have already been assigned. Note that modifying NIX LFs count
+ * can be done only before any LF attach requests from PFs and VFs
+ * and not later or concurrently.
*/
- mcam = &rvu->hw->mcam;
- if (mcam->bmap_fcnt < mcam->bmap_entries) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
- "mcam entries have already been assigned, can't resize");
- return -EPERM;
+ blkaddr = rvu_get_next_nix_blkaddr(rvu, blkaddr);
+ while (blkaddr) {
+ block = &rvu->hw->block[blkaddr];
+
+ free_lfs = rvu_rsrc_free_count(&block->lf);
+ if (free_lfs != block->lf.max) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
+ "NIX LFs already assigned, can't resize");
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
+ blkaddr = rvu_get_next_nix_blkaddr(rvu, blkaddr);
}
if (max_nix0_lf && val.vu16 > max_nix0_lf) {
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-af: Validate NIX maximum LFs correctly
2026-06-17 15:22 [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-af: Validate NIX maximum LFs correctly Subbaraya Sundeep
@ 2026-06-17 15:31 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Subbaraya Sundeep @ 2026-06-17 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andrew+netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, sgoutham, gakula,
bbhushan2, rkannoth
Cc: netdev, linux-kernel
Missed the changelog. Will resend.
Thanks,
Sundeep
pw-bot: changes-requested
On 2026-06-17 at 20:52:30, Subbaraya Sundeep (sbhatta@marvell.com) wrote:
> NIX maximum number of LFs can be set via devlink command
> but that can be done before assigning any LFs to a PF/VF.
> The condition used to check whether any LFs are assigned is
> incorrect. This patch fixes that condition.
>
> Fixes: dd7842878633 ("octeontx2-af: Add new devlink param to configure maximum usable NIX block LFs")
> Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>
> ---
> .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c | 27 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c
> index 6494a9ee2f0d..3b47ecb44d51 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c
> @@ -1510,7 +1510,9 @@ static int rvu_af_dl_nix_maxlf_validate(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
> struct rvu_devlink *rvu_dl = devlink_priv(devlink);
> struct rvu *rvu = rvu_dl->rvu;
> u16 max_nix0_lf, max_nix1_lf;
> - struct npc_mcam *mcam;
> + struct rvu_block *block;
> + int blkaddr = 0;
> + int free_lfs;
> u64 cfg;
>
> cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, BLKADDR_NIX0, NIX_AF_CONST2);
> @@ -1518,14 +1520,23 @@ static int rvu_af_dl_nix_maxlf_validate(struct devlink *devlink, u32 id,
> cfg = rvu_read64(rvu, BLKADDR_NIX1, NIX_AF_CONST2);
> max_nix1_lf = cfg & 0xFFF;
>
> - /* Do not allow user to modify maximum NIX LFs while mcam entries
> - * have already been assigned.
> + /* Do not allow user to modify maximum NIX LFs while NIX LFs
> + * have already been assigned. Note that modifying NIX LFs count
> + * can be done only before any LF attach requests from PFs and VFs
> + * and not later or concurrently.
> */
> - mcam = &rvu->hw->mcam;
> - if (mcam->bmap_fcnt < mcam->bmap_entries) {
> - NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> - "mcam entries have already been assigned, can't resize");
> - return -EPERM;
> + blkaddr = rvu_get_next_nix_blkaddr(rvu, blkaddr);
> + while (blkaddr) {
> + block = &rvu->hw->block[blkaddr];
> +
> + free_lfs = rvu_rsrc_free_count(&block->lf);
> + if (free_lfs != block->lf.max) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
> + "NIX LFs already assigned, can't resize");
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
> +
> + blkaddr = rvu_get_next_nix_blkaddr(rvu, blkaddr);
> }
>
> if (max_nix0_lf && val.vu16 > max_nix0_lf) {
> --
> 2.48.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-17 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-17 15:22 [net PATCH v2] octeontx2-af: Validate NIX maximum LFs correctly Subbaraya Sundeep
2026-06-17 15:31 ` Subbaraya Sundeep
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox