From: JR Lanteigne <root@dnim.dev>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
richardcochran@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fall back to skb_iif for the timestamping pktinfo if_index
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:55:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178759055328.4181951.10346301845266420247@dnim.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <willemdebruijn.kernel.1e07ba16c4cf4@gmail.com>
Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> It may be possible to detect whether an skb_iif points to a physical
> or aggregate device (e.g., through lower_dev)? If so, then the value
> can still be used in most cases.
That only guesses less often (tunnels register no lower adjacency).
I agree with Miroslav: 0 when the physical interface is unknown.
The userspace check fixes chrony only; every other consumer of
SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO has to rediscover that if_index can be 0
and grow its own IP_PKTINFO fallback. The kernel is the one place a
fix reaches all of them.
The gap on cpsw: one napi serves both ports, the driver delivers
with netif_receive_skb() so the id is never set, and it would name
port 1 for every frame if it were. The driver knows the source port
per packet (CPDMA_RX_SOURCE_PORT) and needs a way to hand it to
put_ts_pktinfo(), e.g. via skb_shared_hwtstamps.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 5:21 [PATCH net] net: fall back to skb_iif for the timestamping pktinfo if_index JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24 2:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-24 10:24 ` JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24 7:58 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2026-08-24 10:24 ` JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24 14:06 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-24 16:55 ` JR Lanteigne [this message]
2026-08-24 18:35 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178759055328.4181951.10346301845266420247@dnim.dev \
--to=root@dnim.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox