Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: JR Lanteigne <root@dnim.dev>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fall back to skb_iif for the timestamping pktinfo if_index
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 09:58:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aov5lCT4P_3tmRqR@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178746246095.3786864.2262454553798466512@dnim.dev>

On Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 02:21:00AM -0300, JR Lanteigne wrote:
> put_ts_pktinfo() resolves the interface index of a received packet
> from its napi id. The lookup fails on drivers whose napi instances
> are not attached to the delivering net_device (e.g. ti cpsw, which
> keeps them on an internal dummy device) and on kernels built without
> CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL, where skb_napi_id() is always 0. In those
> cases SCM_TIMESTAMPING_PKTINFO carries if_index 0 and applications
> cannot tell which interface produced the hardware timestamp. chronyd,
> for example, then ignores valid hardware timestamps.

That's the intended behavior, from timestamping.rst:
  A valid (non-zero) interface index will be returned only if
  CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL is enabled and the driver is using NAPI. 
 
> Fall back to skb->skb_iif, which is set for every received packet.
> On aggregated interfaces this reports the aggregating device instead
> of the physical one, but only in cases where the napi lookup already
> failed and nothing was reported at all.

That would cause applications to receive a wrong index in some cases,
right? If it's possible, it should report the index of the physical
interface, but it should not be guessing.

> A userspace fallback for existing kernels was proposed to chrony
> separately.

That makes sense to me. It's a bug that it doesn't check for
zero value.

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-24  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-23  5:21 [PATCH net] net: fall back to skb_iif for the timestamping pktinfo if_index JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24  2:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-24 10:24   ` JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24  7:58 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2026-08-24 10:24   ` JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24 14:06     ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-08-24 16:55       ` JR Lanteigne
2026-08-24 18:35         ` Willem de Bruijn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aov5lCT4P_3tmRqR@localhost \
    --to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=root@dnim.dev \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox