From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: edumazet@google.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
syzbot+586af68eb819833c2d91@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev, achender@kernel.org,
rds-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] net: skbuff: do not leave stale header offsets after pskb_carve()
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 13:05:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <178956393100.22033.7676411417898444402@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915130423.3956471-1-edumazet@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider:
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
- [Medium] Incomplete invalidation of checksum metadata in the new
skb_carve_reset_headers() (net/core/skbuff.c:6842).
--
net: skbuff: do not leave stale header offsets after pskb_carve()
The two pskb_carve() helpers used to call skb_headers_offset_update(skb, 0),
which left mac/network/transport offsets describing bytes that were just
removed. This patch adds skb_carve_reset_headers() to unset the mac and
transport headers, reset the network header, clear mac_len, zero the inner
header state, and downgrade CHECKSUM_PARTIAL to CHECKSUM_NONE.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/6aa3e9d3.f2639fcc.29487d.0028.GAE@google.com/
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index cc3b4b70288b4..609f2c7f4a47a 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -6832,6 +6832,34 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_skb_with_frags(unsigned long header_len,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_skb_with_frags);
>
> +/* pskb_carve_inside_header() and pskb_carve_inside_nonlinear()
> + * remove the first bytes of a packet and reallocate skb->head.
> + *
> + * Whatever headers were present before the operation are gone,
> + * we must not leave stale offsets, otherwise users of this skb
> + * (skb_dump(), drop_monitor, taps, ...) would read or pull garbage.
> + */
> +static void skb_carve_reset_headers(struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + skb_unset_mac_header(skb);
> + skb_unset_transport_header(skb);
> + skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> + skb->mac_len = 0;
> +
> + /* Inner offsets have no "unset" marker, zero them so that
> + * skb_inner_network_header_was_set() becomes false and no
> + * consumer mistakes them for a real (and long gone) header.
> + */
> + skb->inner_mac_header = 0;
> + skb->inner_network_header = 0;
> + skb->inner_transport_header = 0;
> + skb->inner_protocol = 0;
> + skb->encapsulation = 0;
> +
> + if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
The changelog says the goal is that "all the header state is invalidated in
one place". Is the checksum state fully invalidated here?
skb_carve_reset_headers() only rewrites ip_summed, while skb->csum,
skb->csum_valid, skb->csum_complete_sw, skb->csum_level and
skb->csum_not_inet keep the values they had before the bytes were removed.
For the CHECKSUM_PARTIAL case, the syzbot dump quoted in the changelog shows
the incoming skb already has valid=1:
csum(0x100120 start=288 offset=16 ip_summed=3 complete_sw=0 valid=1 level=0)
After the downgrade this becomes ip_summed=CHECKSUM_NONE with csum_valid
still 1, and skb_csum_unnecessary() in include/linux/skbuff.h returns true on
csum_valid alone:
static inline int skb_csum_unnecessary(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
return ((skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY) ||
skb->csum_valid ||
(skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
skb_checksum_start_offset(skb) >= 0));
}
Can a consumer of the carved skb then believe the payload was already
verified, even though the bytes the checksum covered are gone? A leftover
csum_not_inet would similarly still claim CRC32c semantics, and skb_dump()
would print the contradictory "ip_summed=0 ... valid=1".
Should csum_valid, csum_complete_sw, csum_level and csum_not_inet be cleared
in the same helper?
The CHECKSUM_COMPLETE case looks untouched as well. Unlike
skb_pull_rcsum()/skb_postpull_rcsum(), the carve path never subtracts the off
bytes removed from the front from skb->csum, and pskb_extract() trims the tail
with plain pskb_trim() rather than pskb_trim_rcsum():
net/core/skbuff.c:pskb_extract() {
...
if (pskb_carve(clone, off, gfp) < 0 ||
pskb_trim(clone, to_copy)) {
...
}
So a CHECKSUM_COMPLETE skb keeps a whole-packet checksum that no longer
matches its contents. Would it make sense to also drop or fix up
CHECKSUM_COMPLETE in skb_carve_reset_headers(), or to use pskb_trim_rcsum()
in pskb_extract()?
The only in-tree user of pskb_extract() is RDS, which copies the queued data
to userspace and never calls a checksum validation helper, so there is no
functional failure visible today; the concern is the trust bits left on a
generic exported helper.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260915130423.3956471-1-edumazet%40google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 13:04 [PATCH v2 net] net: skbuff: do not leave stale header offsets after pskb_carve() Eric Dumazet
2026-09-15 14:18 ` Xuanqiang Luo
2026-09-16 13:05 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-09-17 14:03 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-09-17 14:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=178956393100.22033.7676411417898444402@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=syzbot+586af68eb819833c2d91@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=xuanqiang.luo@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox