From: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
To: edumazet@kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
willemb@google.com, mst@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net 1/3] flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:30:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179121420852.434549.8121508269046937218@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001191140.2818991-2-edumazet@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue(s) to consider.
Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
(one such reply per series is enough).
- [Medium] The fix is incomplete: __skb_flow_dissect() still has a second
path that truncates a length to u16 when it computes thoff, the BPF…
--
flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff
This patch changes the thoff computation at the end of
__skb_flow_dissect() to compare in u32 instead of u16. If the result
does not fit in key_control->thoff, it is capped to U16_MAX and the
dissection is reported as failed.
> diff --git a/net/core/flow_dissector.c b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> index 8aa4f9b4df810..27d8a01bc9230 100644
> --- a/net/core/flow_dissector.c
> +++ b/net/core/flow_dissector.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1692,7 +1693,13 @@ bool __skb_flow_dissect(const struct net *net,
> ret = true;
>
> out:
> - key_control->thoff = min_t(u16, nhoff, skb ? skb->len : hlen);
> + thoff = min_t(u32, nhoff, skb ? skb->len : hlen);
> + if (unlikely(thoff > U16_MAX)) {
> + /* Cannot be represented in key_control->thoff. */
> + thoff = U16_MAX;
> + ret = false;
> + }
> + key_control->thoff = thoff;
[Severity: Medium]
Does the BPF flow dissector path in the same function still have the
same u16 truncation?
When a BPF flow dissector is attached to init_net or the netns,
__skb_flow_dissect() returns early and never reaches this out: label:
net/core/flow_dissector.c:__skb_flow_dissect() {
...
result = bpf_flow_dissect(prog, &ctx, n_proto, nhoff,
hlen, flags);
if (result != BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_CONTINUE) {
__skb_flow_bpf_to_target(&flow_keys, flow_dissector,
target_container);
rcu_read_unlock();
return result == BPF_OK;
}
...
}
bpf_flow_dissect() still clamps as u16, so the int hlen (skb_headlen())
is truncated before the comparison:
net/core/flow_dissector.c:bpf_flow_dissect() {
...
flow_keys->nhoff = clamp_t(u16, flow_keys->nhoff, nhoff, hlen);
flow_keys->thoff = clamp_t(u16, flow_keys->thoff,
flow_keys->nhoff, hlen);
...
}
Then __skb_flow_bpf_to_target() copies the value as is:
key_control->thoff = flow_keys->thoff;
Take a linear head of 65540 bytes and a program that reports nhoff=14,
thoff=34 and returns BPF_OK. (u16)hlen is 4, so both offsets collapse
to 4, and __skb_flow_dissect() returns true.
That seems to be the case the commit message describes:
"Whenever skb->len (or hlen) modulo 65536 is smaller than nhoff, the
truncated length wins and thoff is set to a bogus small value, even
when the dissection succeeded."
and:
"report the dissection as failed rather than silently returning a
wrong transport offset."
skb_headlen() above 65535 looks reachable. packet_snd() skips the MTU
check when vnet_hdr.gso_type is set. Both packet_alloc_skb() and
tun_alloc_skb() grow the linear part when len exceeds the fragment
capacity:
linear = len - MAX_SKB_FRAGS * (PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER);
So a GSO write of roughly 622KB on 4K pages gives a linear head over
64KB. Attaching the BPF dissector does require privilege.
Callers that trust a successful return would then put the transport
header inside the L2/L3 header. Examples are skb_probe_transport_header()
calling skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.control.thoff). Another is
__virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(), after "net: always dissect GSO packets in
__virtio_net_hdr_to_skb()" later in the series. The later patches in
the series leave bpf_flow_dissect() unchanged.
Should bpf_flow_dissect() also compare in u32, or cap hlen at U16_MAX,
and report failure when the offset cannot be represented?
> key_basic->n_proto = proto;
> key_basic->ip_proto = ip_proto;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261001191140.2818991-1-edumazet%40kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-01 19:11 [PATCH v3 net 0/3] net: always dissect GSO packets in __virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() Eric Dumazet
2026-10-01 19:11 ` [PATCH v3 net 1/3] flow_dissector: avoid u16 truncation of skb->len when computing thoff Eric Dumazet
2026-10-01 23:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-05 15:30 ` netdev-bot+sashiko [this message]
2026-10-05 19:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2026-10-01 19:11 ` [PATCH v3 net 2/3] net: always dissect GSO packets in __virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() Eric Dumazet
2026-10-01 19:11 ` [PATCH v3 net 3/3] selftests: net: tun: add test for VLAN-tagged GSO without NEEDS_CSUM Eric Dumazet
2026-10-01 23:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-06 22:37 ` [PATCH v3 net 0/3] net: always dissect GSO packets in __virtio_net_hdr_to_skb() Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-06 23:26 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-06 23:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-07 0:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-07 0:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-07 0:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-07 8:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-10-07 14:21 ` Willem de Bruijn
2026-10-06 23:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179121420852.434549.8121508269046937218@kernel.org \
--to=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox