Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net] net: bgmac: fix TX DMA unmapping on fragment mapping failure
@ 2026-10-18 23:13 Rosen Penev
  2026-10-18 23:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-10-18 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev
  Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Broadcom internal kernel review list,
	Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
	Paolo Abeni, Felix Fietkau, open list

When mapping a fragment fails, bgmac_dma_tx_add() unwinds with the
wrong slots. It passes the failed fragment's slot->dma_addr, which
holds the mapping error, to dma_unmap_single() for the head. The
fragment loop indexes from ring->end instead of ring->end + 1, so it
unmaps the head a second time as a page and leaves the last mapped
fragment mapped.

None of the affected slots get their dma_addr cleared either, which
includes the head slot when mapping the head fails.
bgmac_dma_tx_ring_free() unmaps every slot with a non-zero dma_addr,
so tearing down the ring unmaps these addresses again.

Unmap the head and each mapped fragment from their own slots, and
clear dma_addr on every slot the failed packet touched.

Fixes: 9cde94506eac ("bgmac: implement scatter/gather support")
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
index 1835266fdd09..134eff89f787 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bgmac.c
@@ -208,19 +208,24 @@ static netdev_tx_t bgmac_dma_tx_add(struct bgmac *bgmac,
 	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 
 err_dma:
-	dma_unmap_single(dma_dev, slot->dma_addr, skb_headlen(skb),
-			 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+	slot->dma_addr = 0;
 
 	while (i-- > 0) {
-		int index = (ring->end + i) % BGMAC_TX_RING_SLOTS;
-		struct bgmac_slot_info *slot = &ring->slots[index];
-		u32 ctl1 = le32_to_cpu(ring->cpu_base[index].ctl1);
-		int len = ctl1 & BGMAC_DESC_CTL1_LEN;
-
-		dma_unmap_page(dma_dev, slot->dma_addr, len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+		index = (ring->end + 1 + i) % BGMAC_TX_RING_SLOTS;
+		slot = &ring->slots[index];
+		dma_unmap_page(dma_dev, slot->dma_addr,
+			       skb_frag_size(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i]),
+			       DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+		slot->dma_addr = 0;
 	}
 
+	slot = &ring->slots[ring->end % BGMAC_TX_RING_SLOTS];
+	dma_unmap_single(dma_dev, slot->dma_addr, skb_headlen(skb),
+			 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+
 err_dma_head:
+	slot->dma_addr = 0;
+
 	netdev_err(bgmac->net_dev, "Mapping error of skb on ring 0x%X\n",
 		   ring->mmio_base);
 
-- 
2.56.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net: bgmac: fix TX DMA unmapping on fragment mapping failure
  2026-10-18 23:13 [PATCH net] net: bgmac: fix TX DMA unmapping on fragment mapping failure Rosen Penev
@ 2026-10-18 23:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
  2026-10-18 23:23   ` Rosen Penev
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-10-18 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rosen Penev
  Cc: netdev, Rafał Miłecki,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, Andrew Lunn,
	David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	Felix Fietkau, linux-kernel

Hi!

This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:

 - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
   development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
   analysis tool scan.

 - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
   (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
   the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.

 - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
   mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
   testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.

Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.

The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net] net: bgmac: fix TX DMA unmapping on fragment mapping failure
  2026-10-18 23:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
@ 2026-10-18 23:23   ` Rosen Penev
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-10-18 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev-bot+sinfo
  Cc: netdev, Rafał Miłecki,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list, Andrew Lunn,
	David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
	Felix Fietkau, linux-kernel

On Sun, Oct 18, 2026 at 4:18 PM <netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
>
>  - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
>    development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
>    analysis tool scan.
>
>  - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
>    (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
>    the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
This was found by an AI review of a related bgmac patch and confirmed by
code inspection. It has not been observed in practice; it requires a
fragment DMA mapping failure. Compile tested only; not tested on
hardware.
>
>  - What hardware the change was tested on. For driver fixes please
>    mention the device (and if relevant firmware version) used for
>    testing, or say that the change was not tested on real hardware.
>
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
>
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-18 23:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-18 23:13 [PATCH net] net: bgmac: fix TX DMA unmapping on fragment mapping failure Rosen Penev
2026-10-18 23:18 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-18 23:23   ` Rosen Penev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox