From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported number of sent bytes to BQL
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:18:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1943289.AeBmeBuHV2@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGVrzcaHLa1kT2wZc993cZFX2geQ4JgOO-u6JcWHFKcn-OZhZw@mail.gmail.com>
Le mardi 3 septembre 2013 19:59:42 Florian Fainelli a écrit :
> Hello Claudiu,
>
> 2013/8/30 Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>:
> > Fix the amount of sent bytes reported to BQL by reporting the
> > number of bytes on wire in the xmit routine, and recording that
> > value for each skb in order to be correctly confirmed on Tx
> > confirmation cleanup.
> >
> > Reporting skb->len to BQL just before exiting xmit is not correct
> > due to possible insertions of TOE block and alignment bytes in the
> > skb->data, which are being stripped off by the controller before
> > transmission on wire. This led to mismatch of (incorrectly)
> > reported bytes to BQL b/w xmit and Tx confirmation, resulting in
> > Tx timeout firing, for the h/w tx timestamping acceleration case.
> >
> > There's no easy way to obtain the number of bytes on wire in the Tx
> > confirmation routine, so skb->cb is used to convey that information
> > from xmit to Tx confirmation, for now (as proposed by Eric). Revived
> > the currently unused GFAR_CB() construct for that purpose.
>
> I do not see much difference between what this patch does and what the
> current net-next drivers does. If you need to correctly account for
> this, it seems to me like you should move the stats/bytes_sent
> computation below this line:
>
> if (unlikely(do_tstamp)) {
> skb_push(skb, GMAC_TXPAL_LEN);
> memset(skb->data, 0, GMAC_TXPAL_LEN);
> }
>
> to account for the SKB length update?
Just realized that this is precisely what your patch is fixing, sorry for the
noise.
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 12:57 [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for Tx timestamping Claudiu Manoil
2013-04-29 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 14:27 ` Claudiu Manoil
2013-04-29 15:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:52 ` Claudiu Manoil
2013-04-29 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-30 12:01 ` [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported number of sent bytes to BQL Claudiu Manoil
2013-09-03 18:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-09-03 19:18 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2013-09-04 2:14 ` David Miller
2013-04-29 15:33 ` [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for Tx timestamping Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1943289.AeBmeBuHV2@lenovo \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@freescale.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox