From: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [TEST] CX7 timeouts on reconfig w/ page pool failure injection
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:31:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c767f25-fa23-44aa-b8d7-b1374627fc9a@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812154101.72b64936@kernel.org>
Hi,
On 13.08.26 00:41, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 21:48:31 +0200 Dragos Tatulea wrote:
>>> Ack, I'll send a patch to bump the timeout shortly.
>>>
>>> That said, the page pool warnings were probabilistic to begin with.
>>> And they were hit in page_pool_unref_netmem(), I think _some_ bug
>>> must still be there?
>>>
>>> IOW mlx5e_page_release_fragmented() is draining more references than
>>> the pp page use counter, that's not normal whether some command timeout
>>> out or not.
>> Yes, this shouldn't happen.
>>
>> You mentioned tag net-next-hw-2026-07-03--00-00 as the first where the
>> crash occurred. Do you know if it ran before without crashing? I can't
>> find older data in nipa. And there's nothing that seems relevant around
>> that timeframe. I'm thinking that this issue could be older.
>
> The data should be there but I think there may be limits on how much
> the DB returns. Anyway, querying directly - looks like until ~june
> there was something missing in the kconfig so the test was skipping.
> But here is a June 1st run which passes:
>
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/logview.html?f=/logs/hwksft/CX7-dbg/results/672642/test-outputs/35-pp-alloc-fail-py/stdout
>
> so either it was running and not crashing for all of june...
> or our crash tracking was broken in June :)
There were 2 corner cases that were missed by the last fix in
the area regarding handling of XDP buffer geometry changes
(fragments get deleted):
- napi_alloc_skb() error path. Probably this is the one one
that triggered the crash, it occurs when injecting an error
there.
- XDP drop path. Doesn't make sense but it is possible.
We have a fix in the pipeline for these.
Thanks,
Dragos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 16:45 [TEST] CX7 timeouts on reconfig w/ page pool failure injection Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-04 17:16 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-08-04 19:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-11 7:20 ` Nimrod Oren
2026-08-11 15:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-11 16:57 ` Nimrod Oren
2026-08-11 17:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 16:31 ` Nimrod Oren
2026-08-12 16:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 19:48 ` Dragos Tatulea
2026-08-12 22:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 12:31 ` Dragos Tatulea [this message]
2026-09-17 16:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-09-17 17:54 ` Dragos Tatulea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c767f25-fa23-44aa-b8d7-b1374627fc9a@nvidia.com \
--to=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox