Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: shemminger@vyatta.com
Cc: opurdila@ixiacom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] ip: skip IP checksum for skbs with CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY set
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:36:25 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080822.173625.182460185.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080822183320.1d8fbe34@speedy>

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:33:20 -0400

> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:24:31 +0300
> Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > We are working on a completely in hardware LRO implementation and this patch 
> > would simplify the hardware implementation. Is this acceptable?
> > 
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_input.c
> > @@ -415,7 +415,8 @@ int ip_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, struct packet_type *pt,
> >  
> >         iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> >  
> > -       if (unlikely(ip_fast_csum((u8 *)iph, iph->ihl)))
> > +       if (!skb_csum_unnecessary(skb) &&
> > +           unlikely(ip_fast_csum((u8 *)iph, iph->ihl)))
> >                 goto inhdr_error;
> >  
> >         len = ntohs(iph->tot_len);
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> The overhead of the additional conditional might outweigh any benefit.

I don't think they want this for performance, they want to not have to
compute the IP header checksum in their HW LRO implementation, which
is just as silly :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-23  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-22 19:24 [RFC] [PATCH] ip: skip IP checksum for skbs with CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY set Octavian Purdila
2008-08-22 22:33 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-08-23  0:36   ` David Miller [this message]
2008-08-23  1:59     ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-08-23  5:15     ` Herbert Xu
2008-08-23  9:58       ` Octavian Purdila
2008-08-22 22:53 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080822.173625.182460185.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox