public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Polyanskiy <ypolyans@Princeton.EDU>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:47:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090511184739.6e497f29@penta.localdomain> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1917 bytes --]

xfrm_input() code uses spin_lock() where it must be using
spin_lock_bh() instead. The corresponding code in xfrm_output.c
correctly uses spin_lock_bh(). 

Note that if the locally generated packet is sent to a local ip,
dev_queue_xmit() calls loopback_xmit() and the xfrm_input() will be
called with softirqs enabled.

This might lead to a deadlock since x->lock is acquired in
xfrm_timer_handler().

Signed-off-by: Yury Polyanskiy <polyanskiy@gmail.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index b4a1317..4494918 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 
 		skb->sp->xvec[skb->sp->len++] = x;
 
-		spin_lock(&x->lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
 		if (unlikely(x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_VALID)) {
 			XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEINVALID);
 			goto drop_unlock;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 			goto drop_unlock;
 		}
 
-		spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
 
 		XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.input = seq;
 
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
 			return 0;
 
 resume:
-		spin_lock(&x->lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&x->lock);
 		if (nexthdr <= 0) {
 			if (nexthdr == -EBADMSG) {
 				xfrm_audit_state_icvfail(x, skb,
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ resume:
 		x->curlft.bytes += skb->len;
 		x->curlft.packets++;
 
-		spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
 
 		XFRM_MODE_SKB_CB(skb)->protocol = nexthdr;
 
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ resume:
 	}
 
 drop_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&x->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&x->lock);
 drop:
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 	return 0;
-- 
1.6.2.4




[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2009-05-11 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-11 22:47 Yury Polyanskiy [this message]
2009-05-12  3:48 ` [IPSEC] xfrm_state locking problem in xfrm_input.c Herbert Xu
2009-05-12  4:05   ` Yury Polyanskiy
2009-05-12  5:07     ` David Miller
2009-05-12 13:32       ` Yury Polyanskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090511184739.6e497f29@penta.localdomain \
    --to=ypolyans@princeton.edu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox