* using C99 in nasm
@ 2009-06-28 18:19 Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-06-28 19:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2009-06-28 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H. Peter Anvin; +Cc: NKML
Hi,
is there a special reason why don't we
use C99 style of assignment for structure members?
For exmaple when assign ofmt structure members
why don't use positional independing fashion
like
struct ofmt of_macho = {
.fullname = "NeXTstep/OpenStep/Rhapsody/Darwin/MacOS X object files",
.shortname = "macho",
.helpstring = NULL,
.debug_formats = null_debug_arr,
...
};
For the sake of portability maybe?
-- Cyrill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: using C99 in nasm
2009-06-28 18:19 using C99 in nasm Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2009-06-28 19:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2009-06-28 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NKML
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:19:15PM +0400]
| Hi,
|
| is there a special reason why don't we
| use C99 style of assignment for structure members?
|
Oh my. Sorry for noise. Wrong mailing list.
-- Cyrill
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-28 19:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-28 18:19 using C99 in nasm Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-06-28 19:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox