From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Steve Glendinning <steve.glendinning@shawell.net>
Subject: Re: smsc75xx & smsc95xx, setting skb->truesize correctly?
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:35:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120822083549.57260n3jdqfgxtj4@www.81.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345542398.5158.446.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Quoting Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>:
> On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:57 +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is setting skb->truesize in smsc75xx and smsc95xx correct?
>> In smsc75xx/smsc95xx_rx_fixup(), input skb containing multiple packets
>> is cloned and truesize for each clone is set to packet-size +
>> sizeof(struct sk_buff), but input skb has minimum allocation size of
>> 9000 bytes (MAX_SINGLE_PACKET_SIZE) and maximum of 18944 bytes
>> (DEFAULT_HS_BURST_CAP_SIZE) (+ NET_IP_ALIGN). Doesn't this cause
>> truesize to be underestimated?
>
> This has been discussed in a "TCP transmit performance regression"
> thread some weeks ago.
>
> More generally, skb_clone() is not a good idea in rx path.
So all skb_clone use in drivers/net/usb/ should be removed/replaced
with following?
>
> I dont have the hardware so cannot send a formal patch.
Neither do I, was looking for gigabit-usb dongle to buy and ended up
checking various drivers.
I guess I could do and test this for rndis_host/rndis_wlan and add
rx-skb recycling to usbnet core for drivers that do copy-break in
rx_fixup.
-Jussi
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
> index b1112e7..3d9566f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c
> @@ -1080,30 +1080,17 @@ static int smsc95xx_rx_fixup(struct usbnet
> *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - /* last frame in this batch */
> - if (skb->len == size) {
> - if (dev->net->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> - smsc95xx_rx_csum_offload(skb);
> - skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 4); /* remove fcs */
> - skb->truesize = size + sizeof(struct sk_buff);
> -
> - return 1;
> - }
> -
> - ax_skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + ax_skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(dev->net, size);
> if (unlikely(!ax_skb)) {
> netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error allocating skb\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> - ax_skb->len = size;
> - ax_skb->data = packet;
> - skb_set_tail_pointer(ax_skb, size);
> + memcpy(skb_put(ax_skb, size), packet, size);
>
> if (dev->net->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM)
> smsc95xx_rx_csum_offload(ax_skb);
> - skb_trim(ax_skb, ax_skb->len - 4); /* remove fcs */
> - ax_skb->truesize = size + sizeof(struct sk_buff);
> + __skb_trim(ax_skb, ax_skb->len - 4); /* remove fcs */
>
> usbnet_skb_return(dev, ax_skb);
> }
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-22 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-20 14:57 smsc75xx & smsc95xx, setting skb->truesize correctly? Jussi Kivilinna
2012-08-21 9:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-22 5:35 ` Jussi Kivilinna [this message]
2012-08-22 6:34 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120822083549.57260n3jdqfgxtj4@www.81.fi \
--to=jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steve.glendinning@shawell.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox