From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NAT stops forwarding ACKs after PMTU discovery
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:43:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819144333.GG3583@cpaasch-mac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376920685.4226.61.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 19/08/13 - 06:58:05, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 15:49 +0200, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> > It's a TCP-patch, that interprets duplicate-acks with invalid SACK-blocks as
> > duplicate acks in tcp_sock->sacked_out.
>
> Yeah, but here, this is conntrack who is blocking the thing.
Yes, of course. I know that here conntrack is blocking the dup-ACKs.
Sorry for having added TCP-stack specific things in a conntrack-thread.
I just wanted to highlight that the TCP-stack has also problems with
sequence-number rewriting middleboxes.
> TCP receiver has no chance to 'fix' it.
>
> See conntrack is one of those buggy middle box as well.
>
> So if you want to properly handle this mess, you'll also have to fix
> conntrack.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-18 5:55 NAT stops forwarding ACKs after PMTU discovery Corey Hickey
2013-08-18 15:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-18 16:59 ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-18 21:23 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-08-19 0:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 0:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 8:43 ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-19 12:33 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 13:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 13:49 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 13:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 14:35 ` Phil Oester
2013-08-19 15:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 15:33 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 17:15 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 18:00 ` Phil Oester
2013-08-19 18:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 19:29 ` [RFC 0/2] Account for duplicate ACKs with invalid SACK-blocks Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 19:29 ` [RFC 1/2] Use acked_out for reno-style ack acounting instead of sacked_out Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 19:29 ` [RFC 2/2] Account acked_out in sack, if the sack is invalid Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 21:22 ` [RFC 0/2] Account for duplicate ACKs with invalid SACK-blocks Corey Hickey
2013-08-20 7:36 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-22 3:32 ` David Miller
2013-08-22 4:15 ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-19 14:43 ` Christoph Paasch [this message]
2013-08-19 20:13 ` NAT stops forwarding ACKs after PMTU discovery Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-08-19 20:43 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 21:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 22:07 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-08-20 4:18 ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-19 18:22 ` Corey Hickey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819144333.GG3583@cpaasch-mac \
--to=christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be \
--cc=bugfood-ml@fatooh.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox