public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be>
To: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@fatooh.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NAT stops forwarding ACKs after PMTU discovery
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:33:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819153328.GH3583@cpaasch-mac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130819143509.GA31320@linuxace.com>

On 19/08/13 - 07:35:09, Phil Oester wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 06:58:05AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Yeah, but here, this is conntrack who is blocking the thing.
> > 
> > TCP receiver has no chance to 'fix' it.
> > 
> > See conntrack is one of those buggy middle box as well.
> > 
> > So if you want to properly handle this mess, you'll also have to fix
> > conntrack.
> 
> Better to fix the box which is randomizing the acks and ignoring
> the SACKs.  Usually these are older Cisco PIX/ASA devices which just
> need a code upgrade.  

I agree, the problem are these horrid middleboxes...

Unfortunately, they will hardly go away in the near futur. Rather the
opposite is the case.


If you have a public server running, I would be interested in the count of
invalid SACK-blocks received (netstat -s | grep TCPSACKDiscard). This is an
indication for such kind of middlebox between your server and the client,
implying that these connections cannot benefit from TCP-FastRetransmission
and each packet-loss will require an RTO to recover.


Cheers,
Christoph

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-19 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-18  5:55 NAT stops forwarding ACKs after PMTU discovery Corey Hickey
2013-08-18 15:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-18 16:59   ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-18 21:23   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-08-19  0:00     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19  0:03       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19  8:43         ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-19 12:33           ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 13:24             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 13:49               ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 13:58                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 14:35                   ` Phil Oester
2013-08-19 15:32                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 15:33                     ` Christoph Paasch [this message]
2013-08-19 16:00                       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 17:15                         ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 18:00                           ` Phil Oester
2013-08-19 18:10                           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 19:29                             ` [RFC 0/2] Account for duplicate ACKs with invalid SACK-blocks Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 19:29                               ` [RFC 1/2] Use acked_out for reno-style ack acounting instead of sacked_out Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 19:29                               ` [RFC 2/2] Account acked_out in sack, if the sack is invalid Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 21:22                               ` [RFC 0/2] Account for duplicate ACKs with invalid SACK-blocks Corey Hickey
2013-08-20  7:36                                 ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-22  3:32                               ` David Miller
2013-08-22  4:15                                 ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-19 14:43                   ` NAT stops forwarding ACKs after PMTU discovery Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 20:13                   ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-08-19 20:43                     ` Christoph Paasch
2013-08-19 21:08                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-19 22:07                       ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2013-08-20  4:18                         ` Corey Hickey
2013-08-19 18:22             ` Corey Hickey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130819153328.GH3583@cpaasch-mac \
    --to=christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be \
    --cc=bugfood-ml@fatooh.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox