From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: isubramanian@apm.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, mlangsdo@redhat.com,
patches@apm.com, kchudgar@apm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: xgene: fix: Out of order descriptor bytes read
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:34:02 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150126.143402.1309886104452878553.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKh23FmxvV82mVrHq5jv-FE+e6u6CkW+xL_a2_ULAQgP_mM2VA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@apm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:12:23 -0800
>>> @@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ static int xgene_enet_process_ring(struct xgene_enet_desc_ring *ring,
>>> if (unlikely(xgene_enet_is_desc_slot_empty(raw_desc)))
>>> break;
>>>
>>> + /* read fpqnum field after dataaddr field */
>>> + smp_rmb();
>>> if (is_rx_desc(raw_desc))
>>> ret = xgene_enet_rx_frame(ring, raw_desc);
>>> else
>>
>> Reading your changelog, it looks like you need a plain rmb() here.
>
> rmb() translates into dsb, which in arm64 serializes everything
> including instructions and thus expensive compared to dmb.
>
> Do you see any issue with smp_rmb() (which translates into dmb) ?
smp_rmb() is not appropriate. You're not serializing accesses between
two cpus, you're serializing the cpu with the device.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 20:03 [PATCH] drivers: net: xgene: fix: Out of order descriptor bytes read Iyappan Subramanian
2015-01-22 22:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-26 21:12 ` Iyappan Subramanian
2015-01-26 21:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-26 21:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-01-26 22:34 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150126.143402.1309886104452878553.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=isubramanian@apm.com \
--cc=kchudgar@apm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlangsdo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox