From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
To: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] igb: use igb_adapter->io_addr instead of e1000_hw->hw_addr
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:42:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161108164214.GF31855@calimero.vinschen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478588780-24480-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3572 bytes --]
On Nov 8 15:06, Cao jin wrote:
> When running as guest, under certain condition, it will oops as following.
> writel() in igb_configure_tx_ring() results in oops, because hw->hw_addr
> is NULL. While other register access won't oops kernel because they use
> wr32/rd32 which have a defense against NULL pointer.
>
> [ 141.225449] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: AER: Multiple Uncorrected (Fatal)
> error received: id=0101
> [ 141.225523] igb 0000:01:00.1: PCIe Bus Error:
> severity=Uncorrected (Fatal), type=Unaccessible,
> id=0101(Unregistered Agent ID)
> [ 141.299442] igb 0000:01:00.1: broadcast error_detected message
> [ 141.300539] igb 0000:01:00.0 enp1s0f0: PCIe link lost, device now
> detached
> [ 141.351019] igb 0000:01:00.1 enp1s0f1: PCIe link lost, device now
> detached
> [ 143.465904] pcieport 0000:00:1c.0: Root Port link has been reset
> [ 143.465994] igb 0000:01:00.1: broadcast slot_reset message
> [ 143.466039] igb 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 144.389078] igb 0000:01:00.1: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 145.312078] igb 0000:01:00.1: broadcast resume message
> [ 145.322211] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
> 0000000000003818
> [ 145.361275] IP: [<ffffffffa02fd38d>]
> igb_configure_tx_ring+0x14d/0x280 [igb]
> [ 145.400048] PGD 0
> [ 145.438007] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>
> A similiar issue & solution could be found at:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/689592/
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index edc9a6a..3f240ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -3390,7 +3390,7 @@ void igb_configure_tx_ring(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
> tdba & 0x00000000ffffffffULL);
> wr32(E1000_TDBAH(reg_idx), tdba >> 32);
>
> - ring->tail = hw->hw_addr + E1000_TDT(reg_idx);
> + ring->tail = adapter->io_addr + E1000_TDT(reg_idx);
> wr32(E1000_TDH(reg_idx), 0);
> writel(0, ring->tail);
>
> @@ -3729,7 +3729,7 @@ void igb_configure_rx_ring(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
> ring->count * sizeof(union e1000_adv_rx_desc));
>
> /* initialize head and tail */
> - ring->tail = hw->hw_addr + E1000_RDT(reg_idx);
> + ring->tail = adapter->io_addr + E1000_RDT(reg_idx);
> wr32(E1000_RDH(reg_idx), 0);
> writel(0, ring->tail);
>
> --
> 2.1.0
Incidentally we're just looking for a solution to that problem too.
Do three patches to fix the same problem at rougly the same time already
qualify as freak accident?
FTR, I attached my current patch, which I was planning to submit after
some external testing.
However, all three patches have one thing in common: They workaround
a somewhat dubious resetting of the hardware address to NULL in case
reading from a register failed.
That makes me wonder if setting the hardware address to NULL in
rd32/igb_rd32 is really such a good idea. It's performed in a function
which return value is *never* tested for validity in the calling
functions and leads to subsequent crashes since no tests for hw_addr ==
NULL are performed.
Maybe commit 22a8b2915 should be reconsidered? Isn't there some more
graceful way to handle the "surprise removal"?
Thanks,
Corinna
[-- Attachment #1.2: 0001-igb_resume-Fix-up-hw_addr-on-resume.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1272 bytes --]
From c6e80c04a7f20bdf3bde490ff842bcc1c800bf2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:44:55 +0200
Subject: [RHEL7.4 PATCH] igb_resume: Fix up hw_addr on resume
A suspend hanging for too long can trigger spurious reads.
The device is already suspended so igb_rd32 fails to read
and sets hw->hw_addr to NULL. If we don't fix that here,
subsequent code will fail to write to HW registers and igb
crashes eventually in a writel call.
Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 8e96c35..d1f9d34 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -7577,6 +7577,9 @@ static int igb_resume(struct device *dev)
pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3hot, 0);
pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D3cold, 0);
+ if (E1000_REMOVED(hw->hw_addr) && adapter->io_addr)
+ hw->hw_addr = adapter->io_addr;
+
if (igb_init_interrupt_scheme(adapter, true)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to allocate memory for queues\n");
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.5.5
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-08 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 7:06 [PATCH] igb: use igb_adapter->io_addr instead of e1000_hw->hw_addr Cao jin
2016-11-08 16:42 ` Corinna Vinschen [this message]
2016-11-08 17:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Hisashi T Fujinaka
2016-11-08 18:32 ` Hisashi T Fujinaka
2016-11-08 18:37 ` Corinna Vinschen
2016-11-08 19:33 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-11-09 13:28 ` Cao jin
2016-11-10 9:35 ` Corinna Vinschen
2016-11-10 13:48 ` Hisashi T Fujinaka
2016-11-10 17:28 ` Corinna Vinschen
2016-11-09 16:28 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-11-23 23:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Brown, Aaron F
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161108164214.GF31855@calimero.vinschen.de \
--to=vinschen@redhat.com \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox