From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: do not allow empty names
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:56:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180202115636.wwsftihixrg46gps@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180202115522.bmuukhfib4harcoy@salvia>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:55:22PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Or place this in the core, something like:
> >
> > bool net_valid_name(const char *name, size_t len)
> > {
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > then use it from dev_valid_name()
> >
> > bool dev_valid_name(const char *name)
> > {
> > return net_valid_name(name, IFNAMSIZ);
> > }
>
> Just to clarify, I think I prefer this approach, probably other
> subsystem can benefit from this generic approach too.
>
> BTW, I wonder if we should use strnlen() instead of strlen() in
> dev_valid_name(), I guess this not useful for device name since they
> are guaranteed to be nul-terminated, but netfilter this would be good
> given userspace can send us a non nul-terminated string. But in
> general, I think it doesn't harm to use strnlen() in dev_valid_name().
Argh sorry, I'm talking about the hypothetical net_valid_name()
function, not dev_valid_name() itself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-28 15:41 [PATCH net] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: do not allow empty names Eric Dumazet
2018-01-28 17:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-01-28 21:54 ` Florian Westphal
2018-02-02 11:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-02-02 11:55 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-02-02 11:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2018-02-02 12:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2018-02-02 12:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-02-02 16:27 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180202115636.wwsftihixrg46gps@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox