From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, yuvalm@mellanox.com, jiri@mellanox.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 11/15] mlxsw: spectrum_mr: Convert into using mr_mfc
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:01:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180326120145.11752-12-idosch@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180326120145.11752-1-idosch@mellanox.com>
From: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Current multicast routing logic in driver assumes it's always meant to
deal with IPv4 multicast routes, leaving several placeholders for
later IPv6 support [currently usually WARN()].
This patch changes the driver's internal multicast route struct into
holding a common mr_mfc instead of the IPv4 mfc_cache.
The various placeholders are grouped into 2:
- Functions that require only the common bits; These remain and the
restriction for IPv4-only is lifted.
- Function that require IPv4-specifics - for handling these functions
we add sets of operations that encapsulate the protocol differences
Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_mr.c | 192 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_mr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_mr.c
index a8f4927ff150..ae8c5b5387db 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_mr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_mr.c
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr {
/* priv has to be always the last item */
};
+struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif;
+struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_ops {
+ bool (*is_regular)(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *vif);
+};
+
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif {
struct net_device *dev;
const struct mlxsw_sp_rif *rif;
@@ -61,6 +66,9 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif {
* instance is used as an ingress VIF
*/
struct list_head route_ivif_list;
+
+ /* Protocol specific operations for a VIF */
+ const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_ops *ops;
};
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_vif_entry {
@@ -70,6 +78,17 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_vif_entry {
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route;
};
+struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table;
+struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table_ops {
+ bool (*is_route_valid)(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
+ const struct mr_mfc *mfc);
+ void (*key_create)(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
+ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_key *key,
+ struct mr_mfc *mfc);
+ bool (*is_route_starg)(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
+ const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route);
+};
+
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table {
struct list_head node;
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto;
@@ -78,6 +97,7 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table {
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif vifs[MAXVIFS];
struct list_head route_list;
struct rhashtable route_ht;
+ const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table_ops *ops;
char catchall_route_priv[0];
/* catchall_route_priv has to be always the last item */
};
@@ -88,7 +108,7 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route {
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_key key;
enum mlxsw_sp_mr_route_action route_action;
u16 min_mtu;
- struct mfc_cache *mfc4;
+ struct mr_mfc *mfc;
void *route_priv;
const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table;
/* A list of route_vif_entry structs that point to the egress VIFs */
@@ -104,14 +124,9 @@ static const struct rhashtable_params mlxsw_sp_mr_route_ht_params = {
.automatic_shrinking = true,
};
-static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_regular(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *vif)
-{
- return !(vif->vif_flags & (VIFF_TUNNEL | VIFF_REGISTER));
-}
-
static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_valid(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *vif)
{
- return mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_regular(vif) && vif->dev && vif->rif;
+ return vif->ops->is_regular(vif) && vif->dev && vif->rif;
}
static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_exists(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *vif)
@@ -122,18 +137,9 @@ static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_exists(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *vif)
static bool
mlxsw_sp_mr_route_ivif_in_evifs(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
{
- vifi_t ivif;
+ vifi_t ivif = mr_route->mfc->mfc_parent;
- switch (mr_route->mr_table->proto) {
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV4:
- ivif = mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_parent;
- return mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_un.res.ttls[ivif] != 255;
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV6:
- /* fall through */
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- }
- return false;
+ return mr_route->mfc->mfc_un.res.ttls[ivif] != 255;
}
static int
@@ -149,19 +155,6 @@ mlxsw_sp_mr_route_valid_evifs_num(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
return valid_evifs;
}
-static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_route_starg(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
-{
- switch (mr_route->mr_table->proto) {
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV4:
- return mr_route->key.source_mask.addr4 == htonl(INADDR_ANY);
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV6:
- /* fall through */
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- }
- return false;
-}
-
static enum mlxsw_sp_mr_route_action
mlxsw_sp_mr_route_action(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
{
@@ -174,7 +167,8 @@ mlxsw_sp_mr_route_action(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
/* The kernel does not match a (*,G) route that the ingress interface is
* not one of the egress interfaces, so trap these kind of routes.
*/
- if (mlxsw_sp_mr_route_starg(mr_route) &&
+ if (mr_route->mr_table->ops->is_route_starg(mr_route->mr_table,
+ mr_route) &&
!mlxsw_sp_mr_route_ivif_in_evifs(mr_route))
return MLXSW_SP_MR_ROUTE_ACTION_TRAP;
@@ -195,25 +189,11 @@ mlxsw_sp_mr_route_action(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
static enum mlxsw_sp_mr_route_prio
mlxsw_sp_mr_route_prio(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
{
- return mlxsw_sp_mr_route_starg(mr_route) ?
+ return mr_route->mr_table->ops->is_route_starg(mr_route->mr_table,
+ mr_route) ?
MLXSW_SP_MR_ROUTE_PRIO_STARG : MLXSW_SP_MR_ROUTE_PRIO_SG;
}
-static void mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_key(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
- struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_key *key,
- const struct mfc_cache *mfc)
-{
- bool starg = (mfc->mfc_origin == htonl(INADDR_ANY));
-
- memset(key, 0, sizeof(*key));
- key->vrid = mr_table->vr_id;
- key->proto = mr_table->proto;
- key->group.addr4 = mfc->mfc_mcastgrp;
- key->group_mask.addr4 = htonl(0xffffffff);
- key->source.addr4 = mfc->mfc_origin;
- key->source_mask.addr4 = htonl(starg ? 0 : 0xffffffff);
-}
-
static int mlxsw_sp_mr_route_evif_link(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route,
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *mr_vif)
{
@@ -356,12 +336,13 @@ mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_create(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
if (!mr_route)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mr_route->evif_list);
- mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_key(mr_table, &mr_route->key, mfc);
/* Find min_mtu and link iVIF and eVIFs */
mr_route->min_mtu = ETH_MAX_MTU;
mr_cache_hold(&mfc->_c);
- mr_route->mfc4 = mfc;
+ mr_route->mfc = &mfc->_c;
+ mr_table->ops->key_create(mr_table, &mr_route->key, mr_route->mfc);
+
mr_route->mr_table = mr_table;
for (i = 0; i < MAXVIFS; i++) {
if (mfc->_c.mfc_un.res.ttls[i] != 255) {
@@ -393,7 +374,7 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_vif_entry *rve, *tmp;
mlxsw_sp_mr_route_ivif_unlink(mr_route);
- mr_cache_put((struct mr_mfc *)mr_route->mfc4);
+ mr_cache_put((struct mr_mfc *)mr_route->mfc);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rve, tmp, &mr_route->evif_list, route_node)
mlxsw_sp_mr_route_evif_unlink(rve);
kfree(mr_route);
@@ -416,18 +397,10 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_mr_route_destroy(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
static void mlxsw_sp_mr_mfc_offload_set(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route,
bool offload)
{
- switch (mr_route->mr_table->proto) {
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV4:
- if (offload)
- mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_flags |= MFC_OFFLOAD;
- else
- mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_flags &= ~MFC_OFFLOAD;
- break;
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV6:
- /* fall through */
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- }
+ if (offload)
+ mr_route->mfc->mfc_flags |= MFC_OFFLOAD;
+ else
+ mr_route->mfc->mfc_flags &= ~MFC_OFFLOAD;
}
static void mlxsw_sp_mr_mfc_offload_update(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
@@ -456,15 +429,8 @@ int mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_add(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route;
int err;
- /* If the route is a (*,*) route, abort, as these kind of routes are
- * used for proxy routes.
- */
- if (mfc->mfc_origin == htonl(INADDR_ANY) &&
- mfc->mfc_mcastgrp == htonl(INADDR_ANY)) {
- dev_warn(mr_table->mlxsw_sp->bus_info->dev,
- "Offloading proxy routes is not supported.\n");
+ if (!mr_table->ops->is_route_valid(mr_table, &mfc->_c))
return -EINVAL;
- }
/* Create a new route */
mr_route = mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_create(mr_table, mfc);
@@ -535,7 +501,7 @@ void mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_del(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route;
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_key key;
- mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_key(mr_table, &key, mfc);
+ mr_table->ops->key_create(mr_table, &key, &mfc->_c);
mr_route = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&mr_table->route_ht, &key,
mlxsw_sp_mr_route_ht_params);
if (mr_route)
@@ -840,6 +806,70 @@ void mlxsw_sp_mr_rif_mtu_update(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
}
}
+/* Protocol specific functions */
+static bool
+mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_validate(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
+ const struct mr_mfc *c)
+{
+ struct mfc_cache *mfc = (struct mfc_cache *) c;
+
+ /* If the route is a (*,*) route, abort, as these kind of routes are
+ * used for proxy routes.
+ */
+ if (mfc->mfc_origin == htonl(INADDR_ANY) &&
+ mfc->mfc_mcastgrp == htonl(INADDR_ANY)) {
+ dev_warn(mr_table->mlxsw_sp->bus_info->dev,
+ "Offloading proxy routes is not supported.\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_key(struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
+ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route_key *key,
+ struct mr_mfc *c)
+{
+ const struct mfc_cache *mfc = (struct mfc_cache *) c;
+ bool starg;
+
+ starg = (mfc->mfc_origin == htonl(INADDR_ANY));
+
+ memset(key, 0, sizeof(*key));
+ key->vrid = mr_table->vr_id;
+ key->proto = MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV4;
+ key->group.addr4 = mfc->mfc_mcastgrp;
+ key->group_mask.addr4 = htonl(0xffffffff);
+ key->source.addr4 = mfc->mfc_origin;
+ key->source_mask.addr4 = htonl(starg ? 0 : 0xffffffff);
+}
+
+static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_starg(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mr_table,
+ const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_route *mr_route)
+{
+ return mr_route->key.source_mask.addr4 == htonl(INADDR_ANY);
+}
+
+static bool mlxsw_sp_mr_vif4_is_regular(const struct mlxsw_sp_mr_vif *vif)
+{
+ return !(vif->vif_flags & (VIFF_TUNNEL | VIFF_REGISTER));
+}
+
+static struct
+mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_ops mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_ops_arr[] = {
+ {
+ .is_regular = mlxsw_sp_mr_vif4_is_regular,
+ },
+};
+
+static struct
+mlxsw_sp_mr_table_ops mlxsw_sp_mr_table_ops_arr[] = {
+ {
+ .is_route_valid = mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_validate,
+ .key_create = mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_key,
+ .is_route_starg = mlxsw_sp_mr_route4_starg,
+ },
+};
+
struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mlxsw_sp_mr_table_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
u32 vr_id,
enum mlxsw_sp_l3proto proto)
@@ -867,6 +897,7 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mlxsw_sp_mr_table_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
mr_table->vr_id = vr_id;
mr_table->mlxsw_sp = mlxsw_sp;
mr_table->proto = proto;
+ mr_table->ops = &mlxsw_sp_mr_table_ops_arr[proto];
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mr_table->route_list);
err = rhashtable_init(&mr_table->route_ht,
@@ -877,6 +908,7 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_mr_table *mlxsw_sp_mr_table_create(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
for (i = 0; i < MAXVIFS; i++) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mr_table->vifs[i].route_evif_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mr_table->vifs[i].route_ivif_list);
+ mr_table->vifs[i].ops = &mlxsw_sp_mr_vif_ops_arr[proto];
}
err = mr->mr_ops->route_create(mlxsw_sp, mr->priv,
@@ -943,18 +975,10 @@ static void mlxsw_sp_mr_route_stats_update(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
mr->mr_ops->route_stats(mlxsw_sp, mr_route->route_priv, &packets,
&bytes);
- switch (mr_route->mr_table->proto) {
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV4:
- if (mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_un.res.pkt != packets)
- mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_un.res.lastuse = jiffies;
- mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_un.res.pkt = packets;
- mr_route->mfc4->_c.mfc_un.res.bytes = bytes;
- break;
- case MLXSW_SP_L3_PROTO_IPV6:
- /* fall through */
- default:
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- }
+ if (mr_route->mfc->mfc_un.res.pkt != packets)
+ mr_route->mfc->mfc_un.res.lastuse = jiffies;
+ mr_route->mfc->mfc_un.res.pkt = packets;
+ mr_route->mfc->mfc_un.res.bytes = bytes;
}
static void mlxsw_sp_mr_stats_update(struct work_struct *work)
--
2.14.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-26 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-26 12:01 [PATCH net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Offload IPv6 multicast routes Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] ipmr: Make vif fib notifiers common Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] ipmr: Make MFC " Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] ipmr: Make ipmr_dump() common Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] ip6mr: Support fib notifications Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] ip6mr: Add API for default_rule fib Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] ip6mr: Add refcounting to mfc Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] mlxsw: reg: Configure RIF to forward IPv6 multicast packets Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] mlxsw: reg: Add register settings for IPv6 multicast routing Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] mlxsw: spectrum_mr: Pass protocol as part of catchall route params Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Support IPv6 multicast to host CPU Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Make IPMR-related APIs family agnostic Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] mlxsw: spectrum_mr: Add ipv6 specific operations Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Process IP6MR fib notification Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 12:01 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] mlxsw: spectrum: Add multicast router trap for PIMv6 Ido Schimmel
2018-03-26 17:15 ` [PATCH net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Offload IPv6 multicast routes David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180326120145.11752-12-idosch@mellanox.com \
--to=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=yuvalm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox