From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@gmail.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz, mlxsw@mellanox.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6: Revert "ipv6: Allow non-gateway ECMP for IPv6"
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 22:41:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180502194156.9275-1-idosch@mellanox.com> (raw)
This reverts commit edd7ceb78296 ("ipv6: Allow non-gateway ECMP for
IPv6").
Eric reported a division by zero in rt6_multipath_rebalance() which is
caused by above commit that considers identical local routes to be
siblings. The division by zero happens because a nexthop weight is not
set for local routes.
Revert the commit as it does not fix a bug and has side effects.
To reproduce:
# ip -6 address add 2001:db8::1/64 dev dummy0
# ip -6 address add 2001:db8::1/64 dev dummy1
Fixes: edd7ceb78296 ("ipv6: Allow non-gateway ECMP for IPv6")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
include/net/ip6_route.h | 3 ++-
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
index abceb5864d99..08b132381984 100644
--- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static inline bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
static inline bool rt6_qualify_for_ecmp(const struct rt6_info *rt)
{
- return (rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_ADDRCONF | RTF_DYNAMIC)) == 0;
+ return (rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_GATEWAY|RTF_ADDRCONF|RTF_DYNAMIC)) ==
+ RTF_GATEWAY;
}
void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
index 3c97c29d4401..deab2db6692e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -934,6 +934,9 @@ static int fib6_add_rt2node(struct fib6_node *fn, struct rt6_info *rt,
* list.
* Only static routes (which don't have flag
* RTF_EXPIRES) are used for ECMPv6.
+ *
+ * To avoid long list, we only had siblings if the
+ * route have a gateway.
*/
if (rt_can_ecmp &&
rt6_qualify_for_ecmp(iter))
--
2.14.3
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-02 19:41 Ido Schimmel [this message]
2018-05-02 19:50 ` [PATCH net] ipv6: Revert "ipv6: Allow non-gateway ECMP for IPv6" Eric Dumazet
2018-05-02 20:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180502194156.9275-1-idosch@mellanox.com \
--to=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=Thomas.Winter@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=mlxsw@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox