From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
ncardwell@google.com, soheil@google.com, priyarjha@google.com,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: default RACK loss recovery
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:40:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180516234017.172775-1-ycheng@google.com> (raw)
This patch set implements the features correspond to the
draft-ietf-tcpm-rack-03 version of the RACK draft.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/slides-101-tcpm-update-on-tcp-rack-00
1. SACK: implement equivalent DUPACK threshold heuristic in RACK to
replace existing RFC6675 recovery (tcp_mark_head_lost).
2. Non-SACK: simplify RFC6582 NewReno implementation
3. RTO: apply RACK's time-based approach to avoid spuriouly
marking very recently sent packets lost.
4. with (1)(2)(3), make RACK the exclusive fast recovery mechanism to
mark losses based on time on S/ACK. Tail loss probe and F-RTO remain
enabled by default as complementary mechanisms to send probes in
CA_Open and CA_Loss states. The probes would solicit S/ACKs to trigger
RACK time-based loss detection.
All Google web and internal servers have been running RACK-only mode
(4) for a while now. a/b experiments indicate RACK/TLP on average
reduces recovery latency by 10% compared to RFC6675. RFC6675
is default-off now but can be enabled by disabling RACK (sysctl
net.ipv4.tcp_recovery=0) for unseen issues.
Yuchung Cheng (8):
tcp: support DUPACK threshold in RACK
tcp: disable RFC6675 loss detection
tcp: simpler NewReno implementation
tcp: account lost retransmit after timeout
tcp: new helper tcp_timeout_mark_lost
tcp: separate loss marking and state update on RTO
tcp: new helper tcp_rack_skb_timeout
tcp: don't mark recently sent packets lost on RTO
Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 4 +-
include/net/tcp.h | 5 ++
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 99 ++++++++++++++------------
net/ipv4/tcp_recovery.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
--
2.17.0.441.gb46fe60e1d-goog
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 23:40 Yuchung Cheng [this message]
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] tcp: support DUPACK threshold in RACK Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] tcp: disable RFC6675 loss detection Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] tcp: simpler NewReno implementation Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 4/8] tcp: account lost retransmit after timeout Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] tcp: new helper tcp_timeout_mark_lost Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] tcp: separate loss marking and state update on RTO Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] tcp: new helper tcp_rack_skb_timeout Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-16 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] tcp: don't mark recently sent packets lost on RTO Yuchung Cheng
2018-05-17 19:45 ` [PATCH net-next 0/8] tcp: default RACK loss recovery David Miller
2018-05-21 18:39 ` hiren panchasara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180516234017.172775-1-ycheng@google.com \
--to=ycheng@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=priyarjha@google.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox